2009
DOI: 10.24839/1089-4136.jn14.1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Media, Body Evaluation, and Perceptions of Physical Attractiveness Among College-Aged Women and Men

Abstract: Print ed in the USA. Pe ri od i cals postage paid at Chat ta noo ga, TN, and additional mailing offices. Statements of fact or opinion are the re spon si bil i ty of the authors alone and do not imply an opin ion on the part of the officers or mem bers of Psi Chi. Psi Chi does not accept paid advertising for its publications Eye on Psi Chi or Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the perception of press advertisement representations of women, based on such attributes as youth, slimness and beauty (Grogan, 2008;Silberstein et al, 1986), teenage girls experienced a significant lowering of positive body emotion. It can be assumed that in accordance with the objectified body consciousness theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), the unrealistic images of women, most often digitally retouched, and therefore impossible to achieve in reality (Kilbourne, 2002;Tyler et al, 2009), triggered in them the processes of social comparison (Festinger, 1954), and in consequence strong feelings of shame and fear. The higher the initial level of self-objectification (in the dimensions of body surveillance and body shame) that characterised the respondent before the study (see Table 3), the stronger those feelings were.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the perception of press advertisement representations of women, based on such attributes as youth, slimness and beauty (Grogan, 2008;Silberstein et al, 1986), teenage girls experienced a significant lowering of positive body emotion. It can be assumed that in accordance with the objectified body consciousness theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), the unrealistic images of women, most often digitally retouched, and therefore impossible to achieve in reality (Kilbourne, 2002;Tyler et al, 2009), triggered in them the processes of social comparison (Festinger, 1954), and in consequence strong feelings of shame and fear. The higher the initial level of self-objectification (in the dimensions of body surveillance and body shame) that characterised the respondent before the study (see Table 3), the stronger those feelings were.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%