2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mediating effect of anti-phishing self-efficacy between college students’ internet self-efficacy and anti-phishing behavior and gender difference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They determined that higher education level, age, and being male lead to less susceptibility. Sun, et al [17] investigated links between gender and behavior. In contrast, the research team did not find a significant difference in gender.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They determined that higher education level, age, and being male lead to less susceptibility. Sun, et al [17] investigated links between gender and behavior. In contrast, the research team did not find a significant difference in gender.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender is an important factor in characterizing human behavior in general and behavior and beliefs in IS in particular. Previous studies have found significant gender-based differences in computer skills, previous experience, self-efficacy, security and network security behavior (Anwar et al, 2017;Bouhnik and Deshen, 2014;Sun et al, 2016). Analyzing the findings of this study separately for men and women in this study reveals that, according to the participants' testimonies, men are more familiar with the concepts of IS than women, and are more likely to implement tools to secure their information.…”
Section: Personality Traitsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Multiple Comparisons Problem: We noticed that several papers, e.g., [61], [217], [222], [224]- [226], [232]- [234], [238], [241], [242], [246], [247], [249], [263], made their statistically significant conclusion by running multiple tests on a single dependent variable. Multiple comparisons problem causes incorrect rejection of null hypothesis, if not accompanied by p-value adjustment (increases type 1 error) [267].…”
Section: B Experimental Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%