2017
DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20173404002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mediating effect of leverage and dividend policy on the influence of corporate governance towards firm value

Abstract: Abstract. This study examines the mediating effect of leverage and dividend policy on the influence of corporate governance towards firm value. This is a quantitative study used secondary data of 181 companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) in the year of 2014. The results showed that leverage did not mediate corporate governance-firm value relationship, and devidend policy partially mediated corporate governance-firm value relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous research results where commissioners' existence significantly affects the firm's value, this finding is consistent with the initial goal of its existence to control the management so that investors appreciate it positively as reflected in rising stock prices (Isshaq et al, 2009). Soewarno et al (2017) also notes the results of the same study where good governance has a positive and significant impact on firm value. The different results are analyzed because of the different perception of investors towards the existence of commissioners and independent commissioners.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Investment Decision On Corporate Value Modsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to previous research results where commissioners' existence significantly affects the firm's value, this finding is consistent with the initial goal of its existence to control the management so that investors appreciate it positively as reflected in rising stock prices (Isshaq et al, 2009). Soewarno et al (2017) also notes the results of the same study where good governance has a positive and significant impact on firm value. The different results are analyzed because of the different perception of investors towards the existence of commissioners and independent commissioners.…”
Section: The Effect Of the Investment Decision On Corporate Value Modsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Yagil (2007) argues that there are debates on how the dividend policy affects stock prices, some of them say that the rise in stock prices is more influenced by operational profitability than the number of dividends paid, while others argue that dividend policies have a positive effect on the long-term performance of stock prices. Soewarno et al (2017) notes in his research that dividend policy is a significant variable that influences corporate governance on corporate value. Therefore, the research hypothesis is stated as follows:…”
Section: Corporate Dividend and Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the ratio between total debt and its equity (Isshaq et al, 2009). On the contrary, Azmat, 2014 used Debt Asset Ratio (DAR), while Soewarno et al, 2017 combined two factors to measure the level of corporate leverage. The higher the DER, the higher the company's debt compared to the funding paid by the owners of the company.…”
Section: Funding Decision and Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other Article's contents are provided on a Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 Creative commons license.To see the complete license contents, please visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ hand, some researchers stated that dividend policy positively affects the long-term performance of stock prices. Soewarno et al, 2017 suggested that dividend policy is a significant variable that mediates the influence of corporate governance on firm value.…”
Section: Dividend Policy and Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…divide ownership structure into two categories based on capital contributions: inner investors (managers) and outside investors (debt holder and equity holder). Ownership structure is defined by Abel and Okafor (2010) as the percentage of shares held by managers (managerial ownership), institutions (institutional ownership), the government (state ownership), foreign investors (foreign ownership), families (family ownership), and so on (Soewarno et al 2017).…”
Section: Research Aims and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%