2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1659126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Budget Participation – Job Performance Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
38
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Another research stream has focused on the intervening path through the cognitive benefits of the budget process in terms of information sharing (Chong and Chong, 2002;Chong and Johnson, 2007). More recent studies have examined the indirect effects of budgetary participation on work performance, operating through psychological capital (Venkatesh and Blaskovich, 2012), job satisfaction and relevant job information (Leach-López et al, 2007 and role ambiguity (Parker and Kyj, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another research stream has focused on the intervening path through the cognitive benefits of the budget process in terms of information sharing (Chong and Chong, 2002;Chong and Johnson, 2007). More recent studies have examined the indirect effects of budgetary participation on work performance, operating through psychological capital (Venkatesh and Blaskovich, 2012), job satisfaction and relevant job information (Leach-López et al, 2007 and role ambiguity (Parker and Kyj, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because a number of aspects of budgeting have moved to other budgeting-relevant contexts, such as budget-based compensation and budget slack (Fisher et al, 2002;Webb, 2002). More recent studies on budgetary participation have examined the mediating effects of psychological capital (Venkatesh & Blaskovich, 2012), job satisfaction and relevant job information (Leach-López et al, 2007), and role ambiguity (Parker & Kyj, 2006) on the link between budgetary participation and job performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, budgeting research can be understood from the perspective of the individual allowing for deviations from rationality, unbiased judgments, and decision making. Chenhall, 1986Chong and Chong, 2002Choo and Tan, 1997Collins, 1978Collins, Munter, and Finn, 1987De Baerdemaeker and Bruggeman, 2015Frucot and Shearon, 1991Hirst and Lowy, 1990Lau and Tan, 2006Macintosh and Williams, 1992Magner, Welker, and Campbell, 1995Marginson and Ogden, 2005Marginson and Bui, 2009Mia, 1989Poon, Pike, and Tjosvold, 2001Simons, 1989Subramaniam and Mia, 2001Venkatesh and Blaskovich, 2012Wentzel, 2002 Wong-On-Wing, Guo, and Lui, 2010 Other (2 papers) Hirst, 1987Poon et al, 2001 Total number of papers 46…”
Section: Psychology-based Budgeting Research With Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that researchers can expand the use of statistical analysis by employing different causal model forms thus broadening findings and applications of budgeting theory. To some extent, structural equation modeling is being applied to consider relationships beyond independent variable interactions and moderation (e.g., Chong and Chong, 2002;Venkatesh and Blaskovich, 2012). We suggest researchers consider the use of generalized linear mixed models as specified by Judd, Westfall, and Kenny (2017) to advance the study and examination of budgeting research.…”
Section: Opportunities For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%