2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals: a patients’ and physicians’ perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
49
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the majority of physicians respect patients' autonomy and their decisions and requires the consent of relatives when the patient is not capable of reaching a decision (27). However there are still many physicians who have a paternalistic attitude toward their patients, as demonstrated by our finding that 83% of physicians thought that patients would consent to the method recommended by the physician (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nevertheless, the majority of physicians respect patients' autonomy and their decisions and requires the consent of relatives when the patient is not capable of reaching a decision (27). However there are still many physicians who have a paternalistic attitude toward their patients, as demonstrated by our finding that 83% of physicians thought that patients would consent to the method recommended by the physician (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such a refusal should take into consideration improved survival and quality of life weighed against the much-dreaded side effects of treatment, given that most patients are distinctly influenced by what they have witnessed in other cancer patients, which will undoubtedly cloud the notion of cancer treatments 31,32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient autonomy is conceptualized because the patient's right to create informed selections regarding their own care while not undue influence or manipulation from others. Van Kleffens et al (2004) 35,36 in their qualitative study revealed that patient autonomy was a comprehensive thought with elaborations on making decisions and defining life choices as sub-concepts of patient autonomy. In contrast to what's usually believed, decisions of patients relating to refusing a medicine treatment don't so much rely on the medical information about disease and treatment options, but are rather inspired by patients' own experiences or those of close others.…”
Section: Table Twomentioning
confidence: 99%