1972
DOI: 10.1177/146642407209200207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Medical Surveillance of Asbestos Workers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A paper published in 1972 reviewing workers at the factory on whose data the BOHS standard had been based [Lewinsohn, 1972] [BOHS, 1973b].…”
Section: Some Doubts That Were Raised About the 1968 Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A paper published in 1972 reviewing workers at the factory on whose data the BOHS standard had been based [Lewinsohn, 1972] [BOHS, 1973b].…”
Section: Some Doubts That Were Raised About the 1968 Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paper published in 1972 reviewing workers at the factory on whose data the BOHS standard had been based [Lewinsohn, 1972] had suggested to Professor I.J. Selikoff that the 1968 standard was flawed, over and above the methodological infelicities listed by Berry.…”
Section: Some Doubts That Were Raised About the 1968 Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1972, the medical officer employed at the asbestos factory from whose data the BOHS standard had been based, published the results of an idiosyncratic follow-up study that he had conducted [Lewinsohn, 1972]. An alternative analysis of the new data, however, concluded that they suggested that the 1968 standard might have grossly underestimated the dangers of chrysotile [Selikoff, 1973].…”
Section: Revision Of the 1968 Bohs Chrysotile Asbestos Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these data, a standard was proposed of two fibres between 5 and 100 pm in length per cm' of air. 64 It was predicted that the risk of developing asbestosis to the extent of having the earliest clinical signs (crepitations) would be less than 1 T o for an accumulated exposure of 100 fibreyears per cm' (2 fibres per cm' for 50 years). Subsequent data demonstrated that 11 070 of subjects exposed to fibres in concentrations within the standard developed radiographic evidence of pulmonary fibrosis after 10 to 19 years of exposure.…”
Section: Dose Response Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%