2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pocean.2017.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mediterranean Sea heat and mass budgets: Estimates, uncertainties and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results can also have implications concerning the impact of variability of the MOW for the recent period (e.g. Soto-Navarro et al 2015;Jordà et al 2017) and the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our results can also have implications concerning the impact of variability of the MOW for the recent period (e.g. Soto-Navarro et al 2015;Jordà et al 2017) and the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We use ERA‐Interim (Berrisford et al, ) to drive the atmosphere, applying a spectral nudging technique (Colin et al, ) and the ORAS4 (Balmaseda et al, ) at the oceanic boundary conditions (temperature, salinity, and sea surface height) in the Atlantic part of the domain plus a correction for the ORAS4 sea level following Adloff et al (). The model initial conditions come from the MEDHYMAP data set (Jordà et al, ). Before the simulation (1982–2017), 10 years of coupled spin‐up has been performed, after a 7‐year ocean spin‐up and a 78‐year spin‐up of the river routing model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to difficulties in acquiring long‐term and daily in situ time series below surface, subsurface temperature variability of the model was evaluated on interannual timescale, using a 3‐D and time‐gridded data set based on in situ observations, named here as MEDHYMAP. This is a monthly resolution product which has been already used in the estimation of Mediterranean Sea properties and is partly described in Jordà et al (). Prior to any comparisons, observations were first interpolated to the NEMOMED12 grid using the nearest neighbor method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaluation, we use as reference two state-of-theart reanalysis products: one based on dynamical interpolation from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS; https ://www.marin e.coper nicus .eu) (Simoncelli et al 2014) and another based on statistical interpolation (MEDHYMAP2.2) (Jordà et al 2017). The historical runs have been compared with the reference products over their common periods (1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005).…”
Section: Present Climate Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%