1934
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.5.278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meiotic Divisions of Haploid, Diploid and Tetraploid Tomatoes with Special Reference to the Prophase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1955
1955
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Humphrey (1934) demonstrated, although letrasynapsis was frequently observed in the tetraploid tomato, crossing-over appeared to be restricted to bivalents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As Humphrey (1934) demonstrated, although letrasynapsis was frequently observed in the tetraploid tomato, crossing-over appeared to be restricted to bivalents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…but observed by others (Belling, I93l:Skovstcd. 1933;Humphrey, 1934;Olmo, 1934;Hungerford, 1970;Luciani et al. 1976Luciani et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In maize haploids, RANDOLPH, 1932 has reported the foimation of ten univalents whereas TING (1962TING ( , 1966 PMC in 11% of cells and 1 bivalent per PMC in 6% of cells respectively. Similarly in haploid tomato, LINDSTROM &KOOS, 1931 andHUMPHREY, 1934 reported only the presence of 12 univalents but I~COCI~ARD et al (1969) in the haploid tomato studied by them reported the occurrence of up to 2 bivalents per PMC. Underlying this problem thus, there seems to be an amount of complexity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%