2008
DOI: 10.2174/1874917800801010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mental Health of People with Intellectual Disabilities who Offend

Abstract: There are a growing number of studies concerning people with intellectually disabilities (ID) who offend, however few studies systematically record prevalence of mental health problems. This article will attempt to determine the prevalence mental health problems in people with ID who offend. Search terms were entered into the CINAHL, EM-BASE, Ovid MEDLINE(R) and PsycINFO databases. Studies were also selected through discussion with clinicians and references from relevant papers. Fourteen relevant articles were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are generally consistent with those of previous studies. The positive association between intellectual disability and lifetime psychiatric diagnosis is consistent with previous studies that report elevated rates of mental illness among both offenders and non-offending populations with intellectual disability (Lund, 1985;Iverson and Fox, 1989;Reiss, 1990;Reid, 1994;Cooper, 1997;Hobson and Rose, 2008). However, in contrast to Hassiotis et al (2011), we did not find that self-evaluated health status mediated the association between intellectual Values are unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages or odds ratio (95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are generally consistent with those of previous studies. The positive association between intellectual disability and lifetime psychiatric diagnosis is consistent with previous studies that report elevated rates of mental illness among both offenders and non-offending populations with intellectual disability (Lund, 1985;Iverson and Fox, 1989;Reiss, 1990;Reid, 1994;Cooper, 1997;Hobson and Rose, 2008). However, in contrast to Hassiotis et al (2011), we did not find that self-evaluated health status mediated the association between intellectual Values are unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages or odds ratio (95% confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The positive association between intellectual disability and lifetime psychiatric diagnosis is consistent with previous studies that report elevated rates of mental illness among both offenders and non-offending populations with intellectual disability (Lund, 1985;Iverson and Fox, 1989;Reiss, 1990;Reid, 1994;Cooper, 1997;Hobson and Rose, 2008). Prisoners with intellectual disability reported more severe social disadvantage, higher levels of psychological distress, a greater burden of mental illness, and greater use of psychotropic medication, compared with their non-disabled peers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…; see Riches et al ; Shepherd et al ). In addition, outcomes are decidedly worse for offenders with comorbid diagnoses, or complex needs (Klimecki et al ; Hobson & Rose ; Baldry et al ; Dias et al ).…”
Section: Cognitive Impairment and The Justice Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offenders with a cognitive disability experience greater numbers of prior custodial episodes, are more likely to be charged, are less likely to receive parole, are more likely to be classified as a high security risk and are younger at first contact with the justice system ( Riches et al 2006;Shepherd et al 2016). In addition, outcomes are decidedly worse for offenders with comorbid diagnoses, or complex needs (Klimecki et al 1994;Hobson & Rose 2008;Baldry et al 2012;Dias et al 2013).…”
Section: Cognitive Impairment and The Justice Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, typical individuals with LD and forensic needs will present with significant mental health issues, insecure attachment patterns, communication difficulties, high acquiescence, and low assertiveness (Lindsay, 2002;Myers, 2004;Hobson and Rose, 2008). Significant levels of support and treatment are needed in order to help them begin learning self-management skills.…”
Section: This Article Is © Emerald Group Publishing and Permission Hamentioning
confidence: 99%