“The Message Is You Don’t Exist”: Exploring Lived Experiences of Rural Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning (LGBTQ) People Utilizing Health care Services

Abstract

Background Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning (LGBTQ) people experience significant health inequities with well-documented negative health impacts due to their status as a sexual and gender minority population. Insensitive or discriminatory attitudes toward LGBTQ people within the health care system have negatively impacted access to health services and the overall physical and mental health and well-being of this at risk population. Few studies of LGBTQ populations in rural areas have been conducted, with even fewer in the Canadian context. Rural areas often create greater visibility for LGBTQ persons, contain fewer supports and alternatives in the face of discrimination, and are often are less accepting of LGBTQ populations due to increased stigma and social isolation. Objective The purpose of this study is to examine the lived experiences of LGBTQ people utilizing health care services in rural Manitoba. Method 12 individuals who self-identified as LGBTQ who had accessed health care services in Manitoba were recruited. Using qualitative methodology, interviews were recorded and analyzed for themes. Results Analysis revealed themes including stigma and discrimination, judgments and assumptions, gender identities, lack of knowledge, limited access/systemic barriers, rural considerations, and recommendations for changes to address the gaps in health care services and barriers to access. Conclusions This study of the LGBTQ community provides an expression of their opinions and experiences, but also provides a voice to this underserved population. The findings of this study provide a better understanding of the unique health needs and experiences of LGBTQ people in rural Manitoba, creating opportunities for meaningful change in health care delivery

“The Light at the End of the Tunnel”: Experiences of LGBTQ+ Adults in Portuguese Healthcare

“…As previous works also demonstrate [ 3 , 8 ] the costs of late check-ups, discrimination, and lack of connection with HCPs augment the already existing fragility of LGBTQ+ populations and exacerbates forms of inequality created by social marginalisation. Additionally, and in line with the recent work of Henriquez and Ahmad (2021) [ 33 ], our study also emphasises how LGBTQ+ people, especially those living in small centres, peripheries, and in the islands, are particularly touched by such multiple and intersectional vulnerabilities, especially relevant for trans, non-binary and young LGBTQ+ people.…”

“I don’t see myself represented:” Strategies and considerations for engaging gay male Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander teens in research and HIV prevention services

“…Interviewees mentioned knowing very few gay young people in the rural areas they grew up in and that other residents were less accepting of them. This is corroborated in the literature; Henriquez and Ahmad 56 found that LGBTQ individuals living in rural areas experience more stigma and social isolation, making them a hard-to-reach population. They also found that less resources existed for LGBTQ people in rural areas.…”

Reaching the “Hard-to-Reach” Sexual and Gender Diverse Communities for Population-Based Research in Cancer Prevention and Control: Methods for Online Survey Data Collection and Management

“…Among younger SGD populations, social media has been used successfully to engage and recruit participants ( 56 ). However, its use remains limited in engaging rural and adult populations ( 15 ), both of whom remain significantly underrepresented in population-based SGD research. Innovative and systematic efforts are needed in order to develop meaningful interventions that address the healthcare needs of marginalized rural SGD individuals ( 57 ).…”

“…There is a dearth of data around NM SGD populations, especially for rural SGD populations. These populations can face different challenges than SGD populations in urban areas due to the complexity associated with socially conservative locals where they may not feel safe being “out” ( 14 , 15 ). Juxtaposed with this notion, much of the extant SGD studies have been conducted in large urban cities, with these populations considered as “hard-to-reach” ( 16 , 17 ).…”