2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-022-01845-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The messy death of a multiple star system and the resulting planetary nebula as observed by JWST

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have investigated the relationship between the CS and the A2V star as follows. First, there is little doubt that these two stars are a physical pair (De Marco et al 2022), given the close agreement in their Gaia-based proper motions (A2V star: PMra = −7.747 ± 0.027 mas yr −1 , PMdec = −0.125 ± 0.031 mas yr −1 ; CS: PMra = −7.677 ± 0.235 mas yr −1 , PMdec = 0.197 ± 0.28 mas yr −1 ) and radial velocities (A2V star: VLSR = −24.1 ± 1.6 km s −1 ; CS: VLSR = −25 ± 0.9 km s −1 ). We have therefore inferred a distance to NGC 3132 of 0.75 kpc by inverting the parallax of the A2V star companion 11 (1.3198 ± 0.0344mas) listed in the Gaia DR3 database (Gaia Collaboration 2022).…”
Section: A Central Binary and Orbital Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We have investigated the relationship between the CS and the A2V star as follows. First, there is little doubt that these two stars are a physical pair (De Marco et al 2022), given the close agreement in their Gaia-based proper motions (A2V star: PMra = −7.747 ± 0.027 mas yr −1 , PMdec = −0.125 ± 0.031 mas yr −1 ; CS: PMra = −7.677 ± 0.235 mas yr −1 , PMdec = 0.197 ± 0.28 mas yr −1 ) and radial velocities (A2V star: VLSR = −24.1 ± 1.6 km s −1 ; CS: VLSR = −25 ± 0.9 km s −1 ). We have therefore inferred a distance to NGC 3132 of 0.75 kpc by inverting the parallax of the A2V star companion 11 (1.3198 ± 0.0344mas) listed in the Gaia DR3 database (Gaia Collaboration 2022).…”
Section: A Central Binary and Orbital Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Models with a substantial fraction of large grains, e.g.,  a 1 max μm, produced radial intensity profiles that are significantly more compact than observed; in addition, the detailed shape of the SED between 7.7 and 18 μm (described above) cannot be reproduced-large grains produce a dust emission spectrum in which there is a smooth rise with increasing wavelength. De Marco et al (2022) present a simple large-grain (size ~100 μm) dust shell model, which suffers from these deficiencies. Keeping the grain-size distribution the same but allowing the grains to be cooler by decreasing T d results in a decrease in the 7.7 μm to 18 μm flux ratio-and simultaneously makes the model emission more extended due to an increase in R in .…”
Section: Dust Radiative Transfer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations