2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0183-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Meta-Analysis of Crossover Studies on Exercise and Appetite-Related Hormones

Abstract: Dear Editor, Schubert et al. [1] systematically reviewed studies on the acute effects of exercise on hormones related to appetite regulation. A meta-analysis was incorporated to quantify the pooled effect sizes (and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals) for the difference in area-under-the-curve responses between an exercise condition and a control (noexercise) condition.The meta-analysis of crossover studies is not straightforward. Elbourne et al.[2] discussed the various options for meta-analysing crossov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review has some limitations as well as some strength. Some limitations are listed as below: (a) the results of this study cannot be generalized to other populations, (b) a meta‐analysis cannot be performed due to the use of various tools and cross‐over studies; the meta‐analysis of cross‐over studies can be too complicated and thus incomprehensible (Atkinson, Douglas, & Stensel, ). Poor reporting of cross‐over trials will often impede attempts to perform a meta‐analysis using the available methods (Elbourne et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review has some limitations as well as some strength. Some limitations are listed as below: (a) the results of this study cannot be generalized to other populations, (b) a meta‐analysis cannot be performed due to the use of various tools and cross‐over studies; the meta‐analysis of cross‐over studies can be too complicated and thus incomprehensible (Atkinson, Douglas, & Stensel, ). Poor reporting of cross‐over trials will often impede attempts to perform a meta‐analysis using the available methods (Elbourne et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of our study is that we systematically reviewed the effectiveness of resveratrol supplementation on FMD for the first time. The limitation of this review is that the meta-analysis of cross-over studies is not straightforward (Atkinson et al , 2014). Poor reporting of cross-over trials will often impede attempts to perform a meta-analysis using the available methods (Elbourne et al , 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%