2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metabolic interface between Pseudomonas syringae and plant cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another reason to include the strain in this study was because insufficient in situ physiological data on its initial epiphytic growth phase currently exist. This is in contrast to known metabolic adaptions to leaf interior sites in subsequent infection steps, which have been studied by others (Beattie and Lindow, 1999;Rico and Preston, 2008;Rico et al, 2011). Our analytical rationale was to achieve ample coverage, sensitivity and robustness required to monitor a phylloplane-specific plant metabolome (that is, exometabolome).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason to include the strain in this study was because insufficient in situ physiological data on its initial epiphytic growth phase currently exist. This is in contrast to known metabolic adaptions to leaf interior sites in subsequent infection steps, which have been studied by others (Beattie and Lindow, 1999;Rico and Preston, 2008;Rico et al, 2011). Our analytical rationale was to achieve ample coverage, sensitivity and robustness required to monitor a phylloplane-specific plant metabolome (that is, exometabolome).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful infections propagate through multiple phases, the simplest deconstruction being entry (Melotto et al, 2008), suppression of basal defense (Boller and He, 2009), reconfiguration of host metabolism (Rico and Preston, 2008), and persistence in an equilibrium related to a metabolic balance between host and pathogen (Rico et al, 2011). However, it is not sufficient to collate a wealth of literature and infer processes from this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…# indicates a significant difference between Psl and BTH + Psl or ARB + Psl at P < 0.05. photosynthesis in Arabidopsis infected with P. syringae (Thilmony et al, 2006;Truman et al, 2006) and inhibition of tomato chloroplast function by P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 were shown (Rico et al, 2011). In our study, in the control and ARB-treated plants following Psl infection in the directly inoculated leaves (3rd) the chlorophyll levels decreased while in the systemic leaves (5th) they increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Their production by Psl has been observed (Olczak-Woltman et al, 2009). P. syringae produces effectors and toxins modifying host metabolism to its benefit, particularly by interfering with chloroplast function, which can result in nitrogen mobilization and suppression of plant defence (Rico et al, 2011;Selvaraj and Fofana, 2012). Truman et al (2006) identified suppression of genes associated with photosynthesis, consistent with the loss of chlorophyll fluorescence, which could have an impact on primary carbon Severe disease symptoms in the form of irregular necrotic areas were visible on Pseudomonas syringae pv.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%