“…The reliability of the CMS was determined using the ICC and Cronbach's alpha coefficient that showed acceptable testretest reliability. It is worth noting this because numerous metacognition studies have not examined test-retest reliability (Bacow et al, 2009;Larøi et al, 2009;Hsu, 2010;Cook et al, 2014;Martin et al, 2014;Bailey and Wells, 2015;Fernie et al, 2015;Kollmann et al, 2016;Kolubinski et al, 2017;Alma et al, 2018;Caselli et al, 2018;Lloyd et al, 2018). In addition, the present findings are consistent with some previous studies (Cartwright-Hatton et al, 2004;Wilson et al, 2011;Lachat Shakeshaft et al, 2020) with respect to the stability of metacognition over the period of time, although the correlation was weak (r = 0.24-0.34) (Cartwright-Hatton et al, 2004) or unstable for some domains (r = 0.24-0.90) (Wilson et al, 2011) of the metacognitive questionnaire when comparing with our test-retest (r = 0.70-0.81).…”