2023
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202300092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Metal–Organic Frameworks Derived Co3O4/TiO2 Heterojunction as a High‐Efficiency Sulfur Carrier for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract: Lithium–sulfur batteries, due to their various advantages such as their unique theoretical capacity, inexpensive, and environmental friendliness, have become one of the new‐generation energy storage systems. However, during the commercial development of lithium–sulfur batteries, they are limited by obstacles such as the volume expansion, shuttle effect, and low conductivity of S, which eventually lead to slow system reaction kinetics and poor cycling stability. Herein, heterostructured metal–organic framework‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrochemical performance of rGO and CC@rGO cells was compared at a scan rate of 0.1 mv/s and a voltage window of 1.7-2.8 V. The two typical reduction peaks (2.25 V, 2.01 V) characterized by CC@rGO correspond to the reduction of S to soluble polysulfide (Li 2 S x , 4 ≤ x ≤ 8) and the reduction of soluble polysulfide to insoluble polysulfide (Li 2 S 2 , Li 2 S) during discharge, respectively [50]. Compared with rGO, the CC@rGO has a smaller electrochemical polarization with a higher peak after the introduction of the heterostructure, implying that the composite has better kinetic catalytic performance as well as charge and discharge capacity [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical performance of rGO and CC@rGO cells was compared at a scan rate of 0.1 mv/s and a voltage window of 1.7-2.8 V. The two typical reduction peaks (2.25 V, 2.01 V) characterized by CC@rGO correspond to the reduction of S to soluble polysulfide (Li 2 S x , 4 ≤ x ≤ 8) and the reduction of soluble polysulfide to insoluble polysulfide (Li 2 S 2 , Li 2 S) during discharge, respectively [50]. Compared with rGO, the CC@rGO has a smaller electrochemical polarization with a higher peak after the introduction of the heterostructure, implying that the composite has better kinetic catalytic performance as well as charge and discharge capacity [51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%