1980
DOI: 10.1016/0041-5553(80)90313-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The method of stochastic differential equations for computing the kinetics of a plasma with collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Other technical differences are discussed where appropriate.) Conceptually, our method is more in the spirit of the Particle In Cell (PIC) methods widely used, e.g., in plasma physics [26,14,5,39,1,23,41]. Another interesting numerical method has been recently implemented for the one-dimensional McKean-Vlasov system [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Other technical differences are discussed where appropriate.) Conceptually, our method is more in the spirit of the Particle In Cell (PIC) methods widely used, e.g., in plasma physics [26,14,5,39,1,23,41]. Another interesting numerical method has been recently implemented for the one-dimensional McKean-Vlasov system [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, a stochastic differential equation model is formulated for a problem in ion transport. When the system of stochastic differential equations is solved numerically, the resulting numerical method is referred to as the random particle method [2,54,66,114]. A similar procedure is applied in fluid dynamics and is called the random vortex method.…”
Section: Ion Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, t M . More information on the random particle method and the related random vortex method is available, for example, in references [2,31,54,66,114].…”
Section: Ion Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this, the asymptotic cost of the MLMC method is O(ε −2 (ln ε) 2 ) for the Euler-Maruyama method and O(ε −2 ) for the Milstein method. These costs are to be contrasted with the total cost of direct and binary methods, for which K is given by (21). As described in Section 2.3, the computational cost of these methods can be easily calculated by writing the requisite (so that the MSE ≤ ε 2 ) timestep ∆t l and sample size N in terms of ε and substituting directly into (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These costs are to be contrasted with the total cost of direct and binary methods, for which K is given by (21). As described in Section 2.3, the computational cost of these methods can be easily calculated by writing the requisite (so that the MSE ≤ ε 2 ) timestep ∆t l and sample size N in terms of ε and substituting directly into (21). For direct methods, the result of doing so is given by (22) so K ∼ O ε −(2+1/α) for a general weak order-α scheme, and K ∼ O(ε −3 ) for the widely used α = 1 direct Euler-Maruyama integration scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%