1936
DOI: 10.1037/h0055784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The methodology of experimental studies of human learning and retention. I. The functions of a methodology and the available criteria for evaluating different experimental methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1948
1948
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…* It is hoped that such a program will meet some of the admirable conditions which Melton ( 8 ) has suggested for the field of human learning. T h a t the results already favor a dimensional rather than a dichotomous non-continuum point of view with respect to the law of effect is, the writer believes, an advantage from the standpoint of establishink a reference standard from which deviate results may be evaluated.…”
Section: Gain I N Response Repetition Of T H E Experimental Group As mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…* It is hoped that such a program will meet some of the admirable conditions which Melton ( 8 ) has suggested for the field of human learning. T h a t the results already favor a dimensional rather than a dichotomous non-continuum point of view with respect to the law of effect is, the writer believes, an advantage from the standpoint of establishink a reference standard from which deviate results may be evaluated.…”
Section: Gain I N Response Repetition Of T H E Experimental Group As mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…EXPERIMENTATION Some 25 years ago, Melton (1936), Hall (1936), Anderson (1937Anderson ( , 1938aAnderson ( , 1938b, and others were interested in this same problem with regard to learning and raised the question of the unitary nature of learning. Melton (1936) gave a good statement of the need for repeated measurements and their relationship to validity and reliability.…”
Section: Multimethods Procedures In Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, such an approach is not a good method for giving a usable answer to a scientific question. As Melton (1936) pointed out, science can only deal with recurring aspects of events. The Humpty Dumpty approach, where each investigator gives his own definition, cannot reasonably be expected to give clear evidence on recurrences.…”
Section: The "Every Little Movement" Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-10-learning (Melton, 1936), a rough indicator of internal consistency f o r the present tasks is the correlation between trial 1 and trial 2 performance. magnitude but should permit the detection of gross differences among the tasks i n internal consistency.…”
Section: T O Obtain Accurate Estimates Of R E L I a B I L I T Y F O Rmentioning
confidence: 99%