The methodology of population surveys of headache prevalence, burden and cost: Principles and recommendations from the Global Campaign against Headache

Abstract

The global burden of headache is very large, but knowledge of it is far from complete and needs still to be gathered. Published population-based studies have used variable methodology, which has influenced findings and made comparisons difficult. Among the initiatives of the Global Campaign against Headache to improve and standardize methods in use for cross-sectional studies, the most important is the production of consensus-based methodological guidelines. This report describes the development of detailed principles and recommendations. For this purpose we brought together an expert consensus group to include experience and competence in headache epidemiology and/or epidemiology in general and drawn from all six WHO world regions. The recommendations presented are for anyone, of whatever background, with interests in designing, performing, understanding or assessing studies that measure or describe the burden of headache in populations. While aimed principally at researchers whose main interests are in the field of headache, they should also be useful, at least in parts, to those who are expert in public health or epidemiology and wish to extend their interest into the field of headache disorders. Most of all, these recommendations seek to encourage collaborations between specialists in headache disorders and epidemiologists. The focus is on migraine, tension-type headache and medication-overuse headache, but they are not intended to be exclusive to these. The burdens arising from secondary headaches are, in the majority of cases, more correctly attributed to the underlying disorders. Nevertheless, the principles outlined here are relevant for epidemiological studies on secondary headaches, provided that adequate definitions can be not only given but also applied in questionnaires or other survey instruments.

Estimating prevalence and burden of major disorders of the brain in Nepal: cultural, geographic, logistic and philosophical issues of methodology

“…In a country with poor telephone coverage, this could be achieved only by knocking on doors and conducting face-to-face interviews [20], which would entail visiting households throughout the country. Many other issues arose from this conclusion.…”

GBD 2015: migraine is the third cause of disability in under 50s

“…While GBD is dependent on data from the entire world, headache epidemiology is a still-developing science [9]. Very large knowledge gaps existed in 2000, particularly in regions outside the Americas and Western Europe [10].…”

“…Crude adjustments are relied upon to correct for measurement biases arising from less than ideal study methods or questionable case definitions. Global Campaign studies use standardised and higher quality methodology [9]. With the single exception of China, all of them so far performed have produced national estimates greater than GBD’s mean global estimates [6, 8].…”

Headache yesterday in Europe

“…It is not known how reliable recall is for such matters, but at best it is likely to be variable and at worst highly misleading [10]. Recent studies initiated by the Global Campaign against Headache [5] in Russia [11], China [12,13], India [14], Pakistan [15] and Zambia (unpublished) introduced enquiry into “headache yesterday”, and Eurolight followed this lead.…”