2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5062682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The methods of waste quantification in the construction sites (A review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, classification at the construction site could be an expensive and complicated process, which is limited by the classification technology's level, equipment level, workers' skill, waste type purity, processing time, site space, cost, etc. Additionally, it is clear that the potential of the recycling and reuse of C&D wastes is not adequately exploited, and further efforts are urgent [6,12,28], which include national policies and strategies [17,28,42,44], effective analysis methods [12,39], waste processing technologies and management [3,9,11], and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, classification at the construction site could be an expensive and complicated process, which is limited by the classification technology's level, equipment level, workers' skill, waste type purity, processing time, site space, cost, etc. Additionally, it is clear that the potential of the recycling and reuse of C&D wastes is not adequately exploited, and further efforts are urgent [6,12,28], which include national policies and strategies [17,28,42,44], effective analysis methods [12,39], waste processing technologies and management [3,9,11], and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting finding was that all listed articles were from after the year 2000, although MFA was first proposed in 1970s. In 28 studies, there was one review paper about C&D waste quantification, in which Hassan et al [39] reviewed the research on waste quantification in construction sites. In the next section, we will analyze and summarize the 27 articles in detail, but our discussion is not limited to these 27 papers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to adapt to the needs of urban development, residential buildings, infrastructure, roads and bridges and other facilities are constantly updated, a large number of old infrastructures have been dismantled, resulting in a huge amount of construction waste (Dong et al, 2018;Faruqi and Siddiqui, OPEN ACCESS EDITED BY 2020). At present, the main way to deal with construction waste is centralized stacking or landfill, but due to the characteristics of concrete is difficult to degrade, the above treatment will cause environmental pollution and land waste, not in line with the theme of sustainable development (Hassan et al, 2018;Luangcharoenrat et al, 2019;Kim, 2021). At the same time, the construction of new infrastructure has a large demand for concrete, and the preparation of concrete will use natural sand and other non-renewable resources, the exploitation of these resources has caused serious damage to the ecological environment (Vilventhan et al, 2019;Nunes and Mahler, 2020;Yin, 2021;Xiao et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hassan et al (2018), the lack of data hinders the planning of future CWM systems. In Brazil, for example, quantitative information on the generation and disposal of these wastes is scarce (Brasileiro and Matos, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%