2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2007.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metrics of knowledge: Mechanisms for preserving the value of managerial knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, audit fees have been found to increase after audit partner rotation, suggesting that additional audit effort is needed to ensure consistent audit quality following partner rotation (Bedard and Johnstone ). Finally, Geisler () argues that the key to preservation of knowledge is to establish interactions within an organisation through socialisation, continuous reporting, tutoring and mentoring.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, audit fees have been found to increase after audit partner rotation, suggesting that additional audit effort is needed to ensure consistent audit quality following partner rotation (Bedard and Johnstone ). Finally, Geisler () argues that the key to preservation of knowledge is to establish interactions within an organisation through socialisation, continuous reporting, tutoring and mentoring.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to disrupting normal staff interactions and networks that would otherwise lead to organizational learning and knowledge creation (Winkelen and McDermott, 2008), frequent restructuring might also discourage employees from thoroughly learning new roles, since they know they are likely to be reassigned or rotated again in the future. Moreover, knowledge often falls through the cracks and is lost when employees frequently shift organizational roles (Geisler, 2007).…”
Section: Drivers and Impacts Of Knowledge Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KM can be divided into a number of practices such as knowledge identification, knowledge creation, knowledge storage, knowledge dissemination and knowledge application (Wiig, 1997;McAdam and Reid, 2001;Wong and Aspinwall, 2004), and depending on the organization, the application of all practices or just a selection takes places. In addition, the implementation of KM is influenced by a number of barriers, such as missing motivation and trust (Szulanski, 2000), missing incentives (Geisler, 2007) and missing time and awareness, as well as fear of change (North, 2002); the persons in charge need to be aware to increase the probability of success of the planned or already initiated knowledge practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%