“…One example of a method that falls into this category are peptide arrays that have been used over the years to map out substrate specificity profiles for SET enzyme family members and have revealed many non-histone substrates, some of which have been validated through complementary cell-based analysis (Dhayalan et al, 2011;Lanouette et al, 2015;Rathert et al, 2008;Schuhmacher et al, 2015;Weirich et al, 2016). Other successful approaches for the identification of PKMT substrates are protein interaction analyses aiming to identify novel binding substrates, which are then candidates for methylation studies (Ahmed et al, 2016;Cloutier et al, 2013;Davydova et al, 2014;Jakobsson et al, 2013;Kernstock et al, 2012;Lanouette et al, 2015), and biochemical purification of methylated proteins either based on enzyme activity (Malecki et al, 2015(Malecki et al, , 2016 or using methyl lysine-specific antibodies or binding domains (Cao et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2013). Moreover, cellular protein labeling studies with modified AdoMet have been employed to identify PKMT substrates (Shimazu et al, 2014), and SILAC studies with wild-type and PKMT knockout cell lines have provided the first proteome-wide collections of PKMT substrates (Carlson et al, 2015;Olsen et al, 2016).…”