2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MFS versus the Trefftz method for the Laplace equation in 3D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After adopting the characteristic length in our numerical model, the ill-posed phenomenon is greatly reduced, and the accurate numerical solutions can be obtained. Collocating the numerical expansion from Equations (32) and (34) at boundary collocation points to match the given boundary conditions, we may obtain the following equation.…”
Section: The Characteristic Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After adopting the characteristic length in our numerical model, the ill-posed phenomenon is greatly reduced, and the accurate numerical solutions can be obtained. Collocating the numerical expansion from Equations (32) and (34) at boundary collocation points to match the given boundary conditions, we may obtain the following equation.…”
Section: The Characteristic Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CTM requires the evaluation of the coefficients in which they may be obtained by solving the linear simultaneous equations assembled by using the boundary conditions at a number of collocation points. Applications of the CTM such as Laplace and modified Helmholtz equations [32,33] and the problem of boundary detection [34] has been studied. Due to the complexity, applications of the CTM are most limited to the homogeneous problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Trefftz method can quickly solve the boundary value problem. At present, it has been applied in many fields of physics, mathematics, and engineering, the approximate solution can be expressed as a linear combination of functions that satisfy the control equation [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Li et al (2007,2008) made a comprehensive comparison of Trefftz and other boundary methods to conclude that Trefftz is the simplest method of calculation, providing the most accurate equation solution and optimal numerical stability [19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many heat conduction problems in layered composites have been routinely solved by numerical methods such as the finite difference method [4][5][6], finite element method [7,8], finite volume method [9][10][11] and the boundary element method [12,13]. In contrast to mesh-based numerical methods, the meshless methods, which do not need the mesh generation and boundary integral have been proposed such as the analytical method [14], method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [15][16][17], boundary knot method (BKM) [18], collocation Trefftz method (CTM) [19][20][21], radial basis function collocation method (RBFCM) [22][23][24][25], element-free Galerkin method (EFG) [26], reproducing kernel particle method (RKPM) [27,28], modified polynomial expansion method [29], meshless local boundary integral equation method (LBIE) [30,31], and so on. Among these, boundary-type meshless methods have attracted considerable attention because of their simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%