The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 15 Years of Field Trial

Shauver, Melissa J.; Chung, Kevin C.

doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3182865d83

Cited by 95 publications

(84 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1). Facebook recruited significantly more young participants (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37), whereas e-mail recruited significantly more participants age 68-77. Flyers recruited significantly fewer participants age 18-27 (Fig.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of Four Recruitment Methods for Obtaining Normative Data through a Web-Based Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

Nolte

Shauver

Chung

2015

Hand (New York, N,Y.)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Quality normative data requires a diverse sample of participants and plays an important role in the appropriate use of health outcomes. Using social media and other online resources for survey recruitment is a tempting prospect, but the effectiveness of these methods in collecting a diverse sample is unknown. The purpose of this study is to pilot test four methods of recruitment to determine their ability to produce a sample representative of the general US population. Methods This project is part of a larger study to gather normative data for the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). We used flyers, e-mail, Facebook, and an institutionspecific clinical research recruitment Web site to direct participants to complete an online version of the MHQ. Participants also provided comorbidity and demographic information. Results The institution-specific recruitment Web site yielded the greatest number of respondents in an age distribution that mirrored the US population. Facebook was effective for recruiting young adults, and e-mail was successful for recruiting the older adults. None of the methods was successful in reaching an ethnically diverse sample. Conclusions Obtaining normative data that is truly representative of the US population is a difficult task. The use of any one recruitment method is unlikely to result in a representative sample, but a greater understanding of these methods will empower researchers to use them to target specific populations. This pilot analysis provides support for the use of Facebook and clinical research sites in addition to traditional methods of e-mail and paper flyers.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participants were also asked to complete the Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire [32]. Based on past experience with the MHQ, we expected the study to take approximately 10 min to complete [35]. Participants were not compensated.…”

Section: Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of Four Recruitment Methods for Obtaining Normative Data through a Web-Based Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

Nolte

Shauver

Chung

2015

Hand (New York, N,Y.)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ) was answered by all the patients at pretreatment, and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year posttreatment, including the association with disease activity, quality of life, and grip strength. 18 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

The Effect of Timing on the Treatment and Outcome of Combined Fourth and Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture Dislocations

Zhang¹,

Wang

Liang³

et al. 2015

The Journal of Hand Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…10 A 2013 review into the use of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire found that it had been used in 58 clinical research studies and 18 studies had investigated the measurement properties of the assessment tool. 47 Chung et al initially reported the measure to have excellent test-retest reliability with 5 of the 6 scales having an ICC of >.85. 10 This has been reproduced in subsequent studies, which found an ICC of .95 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by a group independent to the Chung's team.…”

Section: Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnairementioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Trauma

Dacombe

Amirfeyz

Davis

2016

Hand (New York, N,Y.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important tools for assessing outcomes following injuries to the hand and wrist. Many commonly used PROMs have no evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a hand and wrist trauma population. This systematic review examines the PROMs used in the assessment of hand and wrist trauma patients, and the evidence for reliability, validity, and responsiveness of each measure in this population. Methods: a systematic review of Pubmed, Medline, and CInaHL searching for randomized controlled trials of patients with traumatic injuries to the hand and wrist was carried out to identify the PROMs. For each identified PROM, evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness was identified using a further systematic review of the Pubmed, Medline, CInaHL, and reverse citation trail audit procedure. Results: The PROM used most often was the disabilities of the arm, Shoulder and Hand (daSH) questionnaire; the PatientRated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Gartland and Werley score, Michigan Hand Outcomes score, Mayo Wrist Score, and Short Form 36 were also commonly used. Only the daSH and PRWE have evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with traumatic injuries to the hand and wrist; other measures either have incomplete evidence or evidence gathered in a nontraumatic population. Conclusions: The daSH and PRWE both have evidence of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in a hand and wrist trauma population. Other PROMs used to assess hand and wrist trauma patients do not. This should be considered when selecting a PROM for patients with traumatic hand and wrist pathology.

show abstract

The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire after 15 Years of Field Trial

Cited by 95 publications

References 35 publications

Analysis of Four Recruitment Methods for Obtaining Normative Data through a Web-Based Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

Analysis of Four Recruitment Methods for Obtaining Normative Data through a Web-Based Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

The Effect of Timing on the Treatment and Outcome of Combined Fourth and Fifth Carpometacarpal Fracture Dislocations

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hand and Wrist Trauma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About