2018
DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12772.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Microbe Directory: An annotated, searchable inventory of microbes’ characteristics

Abstract: The Microbe Directory is a collective research effort to profile and annotate more than 7,500 unique microbial species from the MetaPhlAn2 database that includes bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi, and protozoa. By collecting and summarizing data on various microbes’ characteristics, the project comprises a database that can be used downstream of large-scale metagenomic taxonomic analyses, allowing one to interpret and explore their taxonomic classifications to have a deeper understanding of the microbial ecosy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We additionally generated taxonomic profiles for rarefied data which were subsampled to 5M reads (after QC) per sample (seqtk) before processing with MetaPhlAn2, confirming representativeness of microbial communities as indicated by very strong correlations of Shannon Index (diversity, vegan) between data. For taxonomic analyses we further aggregated functional metadata on bacterial species (Table S5) from (Browne et al, 2016), (Vatanen et al, 2019), List of Prokaryotes according to their Aerotolerant or Obligate Anaerobic Metabolism (OXYTOL 1.3, Mediterranean institute of infection in Marseille), bacDive (Reimer et al, 2019), FusionDB (Zhu et al, 2017), The Microbe Directory v 1.0 (Shaaban et al, 2018), and the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (Escapa et al, 2018). Metadata aggregated at the genus-level (Figure 5C) are shaded based on the fraction of detected species of each genus, for which a specific feature annotation could be made.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally generated taxonomic profiles for rarefied data which were subsampled to 5M reads (after QC) per sample (seqtk) before processing with MetaPhlAn2, confirming representativeness of microbial communities as indicated by very strong correlations of Shannon Index (diversity, vegan) between data. For taxonomic analyses we further aggregated functional metadata on bacterial species (Table S5) from (Browne et al, 2016), (Vatanen et al, 2019), List of Prokaryotes according to their Aerotolerant or Obligate Anaerobic Metabolism (OXYTOL 1.3, Mediterranean institute of infection in Marseille), bacDive (Reimer et al, 2019), FusionDB (Zhu et al, 2017), The Microbe Directory v 1.0 (Shaaban et al, 2018), and the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (Escapa et al, 2018). Metadata aggregated at the genus-level (Figure 5C) are shaded based on the fraction of detected species of each genus, for which a specific feature annotation could be made.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although stochastic gene expression is a significant contributor to heterogeneity, it is not the only cause. The sub-state of any given genome/cell depends on a number of factors, including epigenetics, alternative splicing sites, post-translational modifications, and sometimes even microbial interactions (Shabaan et al, 2018). These processes are not always stochastic, and can therefore lead to “directed” heterogeneity, instead of the more random “non-directed” heterogeneity of stochastic gene expression (Chang and Marshall, 2017).…”
Section: The Importance Of Cellular Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADAPTABLE incorporates automated tools to periodically download, process, and merge data to keep synched with data sources: ADAM (Lee et al, 2015), ANTISTAPHYBASE (Zouhir et al, 2017), APD (Wang & Wang, 2004; Wang et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2016), AVPdb (Qureshi et al, 2014), BaAMPs (Di Luca et al, 2015), BACTIBASE (Hammami et al, 2007, 2010), CAMPR3 (Waghu et al, 2016), CancerPPD (Tyagi et al, 2015), ConoServer (Kaas et al, 2008, 2012), CPPsite (Gautam et al, 2012; Agrawal et al, 2016), DADP (Novković et al, 2012), DBAASP (Gogoladze et al, 2014; Pirtskhalava et al, 2016), Defensins (Seebah et al, 2007), DRAMP (Fan et al, 2016; Kang et al, 2019), Hemolytik (Gautam et al, 2014), HIPdb (Qureshi et al, 2013), InverPep (Gómez et al, 2017), LAMP (Zhao et al, 2013), MilkAMP (Théolier et al, 2014), ParaPep (Mehta et al, 2014), Peptaibol (Whitmore & Wallace, 2004), PhytAMP (Hammami et al, 2009), SATPdb (Singh et al, 2016), UniProt (The UniProt Consortium, 2018), YADAMP (Piotto et al, 2012), PubChem (Kim et al, 2019), The Microbe Directory (Shaaban et al, 2018), and the Protein Data Bank (Berman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADAPTABLE takes the standardization process one step forward, thanks to its inclusion of data from a specialized microbiology database (“The Microbe directory” [Shaaban et al, 2018]). This allows the inclusion of potentially missing information such as the full names of organisms, their nature (i.e., Gram positive or negative bacteria, fungi, or virus, among others), and some of their properties (i.e., ability to form biofilms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%