2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microbial PhIP metabolite 7-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-phenyl-6,7,8,9-tetrahydropyrido[3′,2′:4,5]imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-5-ium chloride (PhIP-M1) induces DNA damage, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest towards Caco-2 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mutagenic potency of PhIP‐M1 in the Ames test was only 5% that of PhIP, and the adverse response was speculated to be attributable to residual PhIP (Vanhaecke et al ., ). At and below 50 μM, PhIP‐M1 did not significantly damage DNA in Caco‐2 cells (Vanhaecke et al ., ). Additionally, PhIP‐M1 did not induce the malignant transformation of BALB/c 3T3 cells at concentrations of up to 25 μM (Nicken et al ., ) and did not alter cell viability at concentrations up to 10 μM (Vanhaecke et al ., ; Nicken et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mutagenic potency of PhIP‐M1 in the Ames test was only 5% that of PhIP, and the adverse response was speculated to be attributable to residual PhIP (Vanhaecke et al ., ). At and below 50 μM, PhIP‐M1 did not significantly damage DNA in Caco‐2 cells (Vanhaecke et al ., ). Additionally, PhIP‐M1 did not induce the malignant transformation of BALB/c 3T3 cells at concentrations of up to 25 μM (Nicken et al ., ) and did not alter cell viability at concentrations up to 10 μM (Vanhaecke et al ., ; Nicken et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At and below 50 μM, PhIP‐M1 did not significantly damage DNA in Caco‐2 cells (Vanhaecke et al ., ). Additionally, PhIP‐M1 did not induce the malignant transformation of BALB/c 3T3 cells at concentrations of up to 25 μM (Nicken et al ., ) and did not alter cell viability at concentrations up to 10 μM (Vanhaecke et al ., ; Nicken et al ., ). In the context of the findings reported in this study, these data suggest that the E. hallii ‐mediated transformation of PhIP to PhIP‐M1 is a detoxification process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This chemical pathway is effectively blocked by conjugation of HCAs with acrolein, which could lead to a natural detoxification step. Therefore, intestinal glycerol metabolism to 3-HPA and acrolein might establish a basis on how microbial communities may mitigate HCA or induce acrolein exposure256061.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PhIP‐M1 induced apoptosis and significantly increased DNA damage in Caco‐2 cells, as quantified by the alkaline comet assay and it was dose dependent (in the range of 50–200 μM). PhIP‐M1 was more cyto‐ and genotoxic, than PhIP at the similar dose (Vanhaecke et al. 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%