DOI: 10.18174/470122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microbial side of soil priming effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
(389 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(18.1.1)), where Coriolis interactions are indirectly taken into account through the l 2 4 operator. This Coriolis dependence has been earlier demonstrated for XY 3 molecules as in [35,38] for AsH 3 or in [36] for PH 3 , [37] for SbH 3 and recently [39] for AsH 3 . Unfortunately the number of pure bending experimental data is very poor.…”
Section: Normal Model Of the Hamiltonian For The Bending Modesupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(18.1.1)), where Coriolis interactions are indirectly taken into account through the l 2 4 operator. This Coriolis dependence has been earlier demonstrated for XY 3 molecules as in [35,38] for AsH 3 or in [36] for PH 3 , [37] for SbH 3 and recently [39] for AsH 3 . Unfortunately the number of pure bending experimental data is very poor.…”
Section: Normal Model Of the Hamiltonian For The Bending Modesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The standard deviation reaches r(33, 10) = 5.34 cm À1 which exceeds the experimental precision. Consequently, in spite of the fact that our model is not adapted to describe these molecular levels, we have supposed a bad attribution of some levels or a very imprecise evaluation of some experimental transitions or that some vibrational levels could interact through Coriolis interaction [39] not taken into account by our model.…”
Section: Local Local Model Of the Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] The observed differences are small but well outside the estimated uncertainties of the data used to calculate the term values. Nevertheless, we are confident that the observed Q branches are correctly assigned because the other components of the v 4 = 2, v 5 = 1 manifold ( I Π) and (Φ) states [8,9] give rise to transitions that are about 1 cm À1 higher than the observed ones in Table 1, 1885.0178 cm À1 ( I Π) (the term value for the (Φ) upper state has not been reported in the literature) for 13 C 2 H 2 , [12] 1917.1046 ( II Π) and 1917.02 (Φ) cm À1 for 13 C 12 CH 2 . [13] Our assignment is further supported by the close values of the B v and D v constants for the v 2 = 1, v 4 = 2, v 5 = 1 state listed in Table 1 with those obtained from the analysis of the high-resolution infrared spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[8] The value of G c for the v 2 = 1, v 4 = 2, v 5 = 1 state in 13 C 2 H 2 , 3804.35175 cm À1 , differs from that obtained from the analysis of the ν 2 + 2ν 4 + ν 5 ( II Π) ← GS (P, Q and R branches) in the high-resolution infrared spectrum, 3804.49041(11) cm À1 . [12] Similarly, the G c value for the same band in 13 C 12 CH 2 , 3845.95498 cm À1 , differs from that of the ν 2 + 2ν 4 + ν 5 ( II Π) ← GS band, 3845.67944 cm À1 . [13] The observed differences are small but well outside the estimated uncertainties of the data used to calculate the term values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation