2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-008-0051-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microbiology of phosphorus removal in activated sludge processes-the current state of play

Abstract: This review discusses critically what we know and would like to know about the microbiology of phosphorus (P) removal in activated sludge systems. In particular, the description of the genome sequences of two strains of the polyphosphate accumulating organism found in these processes, Candidatus 'Accumulibacter phosphatis', allows us to address many of the previously unanswered questions relating to how these processes behave, and to raise new questions about the microbiology of P removal. This article attempt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None in samples taken at the end of the aerobic stage stained positively for polyP in our study. Both variants occurred together in most of the EBPR plant samples examined, suggesting that they share an ecophysiology well suited to the alternative anaerobic:aerobic feast: famine conditions deliberately established in these processes (41,46), although they were also seen in non-EBPR biomass samples (Table 2). Which features might be competitively advantageous to such populations would include an ability for anaerobic substrate assimilation for the synthesis of storage material such as poly ␤-hydroxyalkanoates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None in samples taken at the end of the aerobic stage stained positively for polyP in our study. Both variants occurred together in most of the EBPR plant samples examined, suggesting that they share an ecophysiology well suited to the alternative anaerobic:aerobic feast: famine conditions deliberately established in these processes (41,46), although they were also seen in non-EBPR biomass samples (Table 2). Which features might be competitively advantageous to such populations would include an ability for anaerobic substrate assimilation for the synthesis of storage material such as poly ␤-hydroxyalkanoates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following oxic treatment phase, the same bacteria exhibit a 'luxury uptake' of phosphate along with accumulation of polyphosphate. This concept is generally accepted, although the identification and cultivation of the relevant polyphosphate-accumulating organisms has proven to be problematic (Seviour and McIlroy, 2008). Moreover, Comeau et al (1986) report that sulfide addition stimulated phosphate release, but this result was not included into the concept of polyphosphate usage and, to our knowledge, has not further been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Phosphorus removal is achieved by the Betaproteobacteria species tentatively named "Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis" and generally referred to as polyphosphate (poly-P)-accumulating organisms (PAOs) or Accumulibacter (11,49,64). When exposed to anaerobic-aerobic/anoxic cycles, PAOs have the metabolic capacity to take up phosphate beyond their anabolic requirements and store it intracellularly as poly-P.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%