2019
DOI: 10.1101/752261
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microbiome as a biosensor: functional profiles elucidate hidden stress in hosts

Abstract: Microbial communities are highly responsive to environmental cues, and both their structure and activity can be altered in response to changing conditions. We hypothesized that host-associated microbial communities, particularly those colonizing host surfaces, can serve as in situ sensors to reveal environmental conditions experienced by both microorganisms and the host. For a proof-of-concept, we studied a model plant-soil system and employed a non-deterministic gene-centric approach. A holistic analysis was … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the potential biases associated with the above-described PCR-based approach, we analyzed previously reported ( 32 ) shotgun metagenomes of the same tomato and lettuce root samples ( n = 3 each). Assembled open reading frame (ORF) sequences from the metagenomes identified using Prodigal were aligned against the MIBiG database, generating a list of the 50 most abundant NRPSs and PKSs in each of the root data sets (representing the normalized abundance within samples by plotting the coefficient of variance [CV] for each gene) ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the potential biases associated with the above-described PCR-based approach, we analyzed previously reported ( 32 ) shotgun metagenomes of the same tomato and lettuce root samples ( n = 3 each). Assembled open reading frame (ORF) sequences from the metagenomes identified using Prodigal were aligned against the MIBiG database, generating a list of the 50 most abundant NRPSs and PKSs in each of the root data sets (representing the normalized abundance within samples by plotting the coefficient of variance [CV] for each gene) ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as gene clusters are often silent or expressed under very specific conditions, we evaluated gene expression in parallel to gene occurrence to uncover active BGCs with ecological importance in the highly dynamic root ecosystem. Thus, in parallel to the shotgun metagenome analysis described above, we applied a similar analytical approach using the previously collected shotgun metatranscriptomes ( 32 ) to identify NRPSs and PKSs with enhanced expression in lettuce and/or tomato root microbiomes. Interestingly, 60% (30/50) and 46% (23/50) of the AD and KS domains that were highly abundant in the tomato and lettuce root samples, respectively, were highly expressed as well ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the potential biases associated with the above PCR-based approach, we analyzed previously published (32) shotgun metagenomes of the same tomato and lettuce root samples (n=3 each). Assembled open reading frame (ORF) sequences from the metagenomes identified using Prodigal were aligned against the MIBiG database, generating a list of the fifty most abundant NRPSs and PKSs in each of the root datasets (representing the normalized abundance within-samples by plotting the coefficient of variance (CV) for each gene, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%