1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1923(91)90078-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microclimate of maize and bean crops in tropical America: a comparison between monocultures and polycultures planted at high and low density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the leaf wetness duration was usually shorter within the intercrop than within the pea monocrop. These results are consistent with the current understanding of the development of humidity within a canopy (Castro et al 1991). Air humidity is generally higher within a closed than within an open canopy because there are more transpiring leaves, and because humidity is trapped in a dense canopy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At the same time, the leaf wetness duration was usually shorter within the intercrop than within the pea monocrop. These results are consistent with the current understanding of the development of humidity within a canopy (Castro et al 1991). Air humidity is generally higher within a closed than within an open canopy because there are more transpiring leaves, and because humidity is trapped in a dense canopy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Changes in root exudation patterns and rhizosphere interactions wrought by Columbo may have fostered enhanced systemic resistance in wheat (Doornbos et al., 2012; Olanrewaju et al., 2019). Certain morphological traits inherent to Columbo not measured here such as canopy density or leaf size could have affected the microclimate within the plot (Castro et al., 1991; Enikuomehin et al., 2010; Fernández‐Aparicio et al., 2010; Guo et al., 2021). Given that these suppressive effects were dependent on year, it is likely that weather may have played a role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some may be better than others for particular applications, but no greenhouse type is considered the best [1]. Control of the micro-climate of the greenhouse is essential in order to encourage crop production considering the unstable nature of temperature, relative humidity, CO 2 concentration, and solar radiation [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The possibilities offered by greenhouse climate computers have solved the problems relating to the regulation and respect of climate instructions required by protected cultivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%