2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06799-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microstructure and the origin of the Venus from Willendorf

Abstract: The origin and key details of the making of the ~ 30,000 year old Venus from Willendorf remained a secret since its discovery for more than a hundred years. Based on new micro-computed tomography scans with a resolution of 11.5 µm, our analyses can explain the origin as well as the choice of material and particular surface features. It allowed the identification of internal structure properties and a chronological assignment of the Venus oolite to the Mesozoic. Sampling numerous oolite occurrences ranging ~ 25… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume not, but actually we do not know. However, we do know that there are figurines (so-called 'Venus figurines') dating back 14-38 000 years ago that depict individuals living with obesity, for example the Venus of Willendorf [170]. These have exaggerated sexual features and been interpreted as representing fertility deities [171].…”
Section: Problems With the Dual Intervention Point/ Drifty Gene Idea ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume not, but actually we do not know. However, we do know that there are figurines (so-called 'Venus figurines') dating back 14-38 000 years ago that depict individuals living with obesity, for example the Venus of Willendorf [170]. These have exaggerated sexual features and been interpreted as representing fertility deities [171].…”
Section: Problems With the Dual Intervention Point/ Drifty Gene Idea ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional radiology after 1889 and computed tomography after 1975 have been present in archaeology since its beginnings. The use of algorithms for the reconstruction of 2D images (for example: Inverse Fourier Transform or the filtered back projection commonly used today) is considered a noninvasive technique for the anatomical study of delicate, unstable and valuable artefacts [ 24 ] such as mummies, stone, Palaeolithic bone or wooden remains [ 4 , 5 , 7 , 69 ], papyrus scrolls, metal tools or weapons [ 28 ], jewellery, pottery, wall paintings, Ötzi—Italy [ 25 , 70 ], the Venus from Willendorf [ 26 ] etc.…”
Section: Tomographic Reconstruction In Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of published sources shows that the use of nondestructive CT or µCT technology in archaeology has so far focused mainly on the study of very delicate objects from the Palaeolithic and early civilisations. For example, CT scanners have been used to examine mummies [ 24 ], Ötzi [ 25 ] and The Venus from Willendorf [ 26 ], to read scrolls, to study the structure of clay tiles, pottery [ 27 ] and Etruscan bronze statues [ 28 ], to study textiles, wooden, bone and metal objects, the contents of sarcophagi, the forensic evaluation of art paintings, the technologies used to produce various objects and the mummification process, etc. Archaeologists still predominantly used the technologies, procedures and algorithms of medical computer tomography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some cases, ooids can reach sizes of > 2mm ("giant ooids": e.g., Sumner & Grotzinger, 1993;Li et al, 2015;2021). Ooids have caught the attention of humans since prehistoric times (Binsteiner et al, 2008;Weber et al, 2022) and were already mentioned by Roman naturalists (Burne et al, 2012). However, their first scientific description was provided in a treatise devoted entirely to the ooids of the Lower Buntsandstein (Lower Triassic) from northern and central Germany by Brückmann (1721).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%