1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)31474-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Migrating Motor Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) (Szurszewski, 1969) which is characterized by periods of intense contractile activity interrupted by periods of quiescence, the whole complex lasting between 1 and 2 h (see Vantrappen, 1982). Anaesthetized animals fail to show this pattern and although the reasons for this are not known they must, in some way, involve the removal of a controlling influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) (Szurszewski, 1969) which is characterized by periods of intense contractile activity interrupted by periods of quiescence, the whole complex lasting between 1 and 2 h (see Vantrappen, 1982). Anaesthetized animals fail to show this pattern and although the reasons for this are not known they must, in some way, involve the removal of a controlling influence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Billroth II group the interdigestive migrating motor complex (IMMC) showed a higher relative duration of phase II activity than the controls and a shorter mean time-interval than the controls between subsequent activity fronts, with abnormal jeju nal propagation. These findings indicate that the distal two-thirds of the stomach are neces sary for the inhibitory mechanism, which in normal conditions slow down the idiointestinal interdigestive motor activity to the level of that of the stomach, and suggest that some post gastrectomy syndromes, such as diarrhoea, may have their pathological basis in this hyperac tive intestinal IMMC.It is well known that the interdigestive migrating motor complex (IMMC) [1] starts every 1-2 h from the cardias and propagates through the stomach to the duodenum and the remaining small intestine, keeping the gut lumen clean [2,3] (fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He concluded that IAP measured by BP was the most reliable method. Other disadvantages of gastric pressure measurement using a water column as a medium for pressure measurement are that the pressure tends to fluctuate during migrating motor complexes [20,21], it cannot be used during enteral feeding by a nasogastric tube, and it is relatively costly. Gastric pressure measurement by a catheter with an inflated balloon at the tip, as suggested by Spiegelberg, does not have the disadvantages mentioned above, but it does have the advantages of continuity and simplicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%