The Minds of God(s) and Humans: Differences in Mind Perception in Fiji and North America

Abstract

Previous research suggests that how people conceive of minds depends on the culture in which they live, both in determining how they interact with other human minds and how they infer the unseen minds of gods. We use exploratory factor analysis to compare how people from different societies with distinct models of human minds and different religious traditions perceive the minds of humans and gods. In two North American samples (American adults, N = 186; Canadian students, N = 202), we replicated a previously found two‐factor agency/experience structure for both human and divine minds, but in Fijian samples (Indigenous iT aukei Fijians, N = 77; Fijians of Indian descent, N = 214; total N = 679) we found a three‐factor structure, with the additional containing items related to social relationships. Further, Fijians’ responses revealed a different three‐factor structure for human minds and gods’ minds. We used these factors as dimensions in the conception of minds to predict (a) expectations about human and divine tendencies towards punishment and reward; and (b) conception of gods as more embodied (an extension of experience) or more able to know people's thoughts (an extension of agency). We found variation in how these factors predict conceptions of agents across groups, indicating further theory is needed to explain how culturally generated concepts of mind lead to other sorts of social inferences. We conclude that mind perception is shaped by culturally defined social expectations and recommend further work in different cultural contexts to examine the interplay between culture and social cognition.

A Survey on Wellness and Its Predictors Amongst Fiji High School Students

“…These studies suggested that although it is essential to consider socio economic factors as confounders, ethnic identity has significant associations with mental health. Willard and McNamara had observed this significant association through their study and concluded that Fijians of Indian descent tend to focus more on internal mental states than Itaukei Fijians ( 32 ). This may potentially explain the significant difference of psychological wellness between the two ethnic groups.…”

“…As results indicated, religion is considered sacred and important to Itaukei people. Literature also indicates this, stating that Christianity is considered core aspect of identity ( 32 ). This may potentially explain results of Itaukei participants having higher scores for spiritual wellness.…”

A Cultural Species and its Cognitive Phenotypes: Implications for Philosophy

“…Cross-cultural variation in conceptions of the mind may also shape the extent to which people engage in mentalizing across contexts (Willard and McNamara 2019). Anthropologists have identified six different "theories of mind" from across the ethnographic spectrum.…”

Building a global psychological science through research in the Pacific Island nation of Fiji: a systematic review of the literature

“…The majority of the cognition themes related to religious and cultural influences on attitudes and beliefs. For example, Willard and McNamara [45] found Fijians' conceptualisation of the human mind, the agentic self and the nature of God was more socio-centric and multivariate than North American samples, despite similar Christian religious teachings about God. This finding indicate the collectivist cultural influence not just on social behaviours and values but also on central aspects of one's consciousness and sense of agency.…”