2007
DOI: 10.1017/s095925980800258x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) after 20 years of research and clinical practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 30 years ago, the MNA tool was developed in recognition of the high prevalence and specificity of malnutrition among institutionalized geriatric patients [ 22 , 23 ]. Nowadays, MNA is well known by health care providers for evaluating the adequacy of nutritional status in elderly patients [ 49 ], and its reliability is also confirmed in this review by an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient: 0.70 to 0.70) [ 33 , 34 ] and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.85 to 8.94) [ 32 ]. Moreover, MNA was strongly correlated with PG-SGA for the assessment of hospitalized patients affected by stroke in Australia [ 48 ], and MNA correlated with objective measures including anthropometric and laboratory tests for the assessment of malnutrition among patients with end-stage renal failure, liver disease, gerontological conditions, and stroke in European and Asian populations [ 44 , 47 , 50 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Approximately 30 years ago, the MNA tool was developed in recognition of the high prevalence and specificity of malnutrition among institutionalized geriatric patients [ 22 , 23 ]. Nowadays, MNA is well known by health care providers for evaluating the adequacy of nutritional status in elderly patients [ 49 ], and its reliability is also confirmed in this review by an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient: 0.70 to 0.70) [ 33 , 34 ] and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.85 to 8.94) [ 32 ]. Moreover, MNA was strongly correlated with PG-SGA for the assessment of hospitalized patients affected by stroke in Australia [ 48 ], and MNA correlated with objective measures including anthropometric and laboratory tests for the assessment of malnutrition among patients with end-stage renal failure, liver disease, gerontological conditions, and stroke in European and Asian populations [ 44 , 47 , 50 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The MNA has also been described as a popular and proven instrument in geriatric research in many countries (Secher et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The questionnaire consisted of basic sociodemographic variables and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scale (11). MNA is an effective, easily administered, validated and widespread tool designed to identify elders who are malnourished or at risk of developing malnutrition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has 18 questions in four dimensions; anthropometric assessment, general assessment, dietary assessment and self assessment. The total score of MNA is 30; scores above 23.5 are considered as well-nourished, 17 to 23.5 as risk of malnutrition and <17 as malnourished (11). The MNA has been translated into Sinhala, and validated and used in Sri Lanka (9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%