2012
DOI: 10.4171/114-1/6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Minimal Model Program revisited

Abstract: Abstract. We give a light introduction to some recent developments in Mori theory, and to our recent direct proof of the finite generation of the canonical ring.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [7], the short time existence of the solution of (2.1) is proved. Then, in [11], [10], and [3], it is proved that the solution ω t of (2.1) exists for all time, i.e. t ∈ [0, +∞), and there exists a unique semi-positive current ω ∞ on M which satisfies that: …”
Section: Corollary 12 If M Is a Minimal Projective Manifold Of Genementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [7], the short time existence of the solution of (2.1) is proved. Then, in [11], [10], and [3], it is proved that the solution ω t of (2.1) exists for all time, i.e. t ∈ [0, +∞), and there exists a unique semi-positive current ω ∞ on M which satisfies that: …”
Section: Corollary 12 If M Is a Minimal Projective Manifold Of Genementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By [11], [10], [3], and [15], for any Kähler metric as initial metric, the solution ω t of the Kähler-Ricci flow equation exists for all time t ∈ [0, ∞), and the scalar curvature of ω t is uniformly bounded. Thus we can prove (1.1) by using the technique developed in [6], where a Hitchin-Thorpe type inequality was proved for 4-manifolds which admit a long time solution to a normalized Ricci flow equation with bounded scalar curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [Laz09,CL12b], Theorem 2.3 was proved directly and without the MMP, only by using induction on the dimension and the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing. The proof of this result is not the topic here, as it was clearly surveyed in [Cor11,CL12a]. In this paper, I take Theorem 2.3 as a black box, and build upon it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%