The minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: introduction to structured reporting

Delvaux, M.; Korman, Louis Y.; Armengol-Miró, J. R.; Crespi, Massimo; Cass, Oliver W.; Hagenmüller, F; Zwiebel, F. M.

doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00128-7

Cited by 26 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They found a good concordance in the assessments of 12 out of 16 findings in IBD [18]. Some of the terms and their attributes in these studies are either not currently used or are not according to the Minimal Standard Terminology version 2.0 (MST) approved by most of the international endoscopy organisations (OMED, ESGE, ASGE, JSGE) [19]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis

2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…MST contains a minimal list of terms and structure to record the results of 99% of routine endoscopic examinations [12]. It depicts a uniform hierarchy to express endoscopic findings and procedures which constitutes the bulk of its content.…”

Section: Background and Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was developed using Microsoft Visual Basic version 6 (VB6) and Microsoft Access 2000. The Minimal Standard Terminology for Digestive Endoscopy (MST) provided most of the domain knowledge [12]. This knowledge was embedded into the program code and relational data model.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of software maintainability with openEHR – a comparison of architectures

Atalag

Yang²,

Tempero

et al. 2014

International Journal of Medical Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For illustration purposes we have chosen the Minimal Standard Terminology (MST) which was integrated in 2002 into the META [11], and is one of the few UMLS source terminologies, the integration of which was reported. The MST was conceived as a “minimal” list of terms and structure to be used within computer systems to facilitate standardized reporting of gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations (GIE) [16]. It consists of 24 interlinked tables, each containing terms, qualifiers and modifiers that cover 95% of the commonly used terms in GIE reports.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Source authenticity in the UMLS – A case study of the Minimal Standard Terminology

Elhanan

Huang

Perl

2010

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As the UMLS integrates multiple source vocabularies, the integration process requires that certain adaptation be applied to the source. Our interest is in examining the relationship between the UMLS representation of a source vocabulary and the source vocabulary itself. We investigated the integration of the Minimal Standard Terminology (MST) into the UMLS in order to examine how close its UMLS representation is to the source MST. The MST was conceived as a “minimal” list of terms and structure intended for use within computer systems to facilitate standardized reporting of gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations. Although the MST has an overall schema and implied relationship structure, many of the UMLS integrated MST terms were found to be hierarchically orphaned, and with lateral relationships that do not closely adhere to the source MST. Thus, the MST representation within the UMLS significantly differs from that of the source MST. These representation discrepancies may affect the usability of the MST representation in the UMLS for knowledge acquisition. Furthermore, they pose a problem from the perspective of application developers. While these findings may not necessarily apply to other source terminologies, they highlight the conflict between preservation of authentic concept orientation and the UMLS overall desire to provide fully specified names for all source terms.

show abstract

The minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: introduction to structured reporting

Cited by 26 publications

References 0 publications

Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis

Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis

Evaluation of software maintainability with openEHR – a comparison of architectures

Source authenticity in the UMLS – A case study of the Minimal Standard Terminology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About