2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl084889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Minimum Scale of Grooving on a Recently Ruptured Limestone Fault

Abstract: Faults have grooves that are formed by abrasion and wear during slip. Recent observations indicate that this grooving is only a large‐scale feature, indicating brittle behavior has a length scale limit. The connection between this scale and earthquake behavior remains limited because no examples exist from a proven seismogenic fault. Here, we address this problem and analyze differences in this scale between lithologies to further our understanding of the underlying mechanics. This study uses samples from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rocks display different failure mechanisms due to variations in cohesive strength and ability to alleviate stress concentration through yielding and grain crushing (e.g., Rück et al, 2017;Vora & Morgan, 2019). Understanding how mixed mode dynamic fracture propagation manifests in these rock types is critically important in understanding the development of seismogenic fault damage zones, which exert fundamental controls on coseismic energy dissipation, interseismic strain energy accumulation, and the longer-term hydraulic structure of fault zones (e.g., Aben et al, 2017;Faulkner et al, 2011;Okubo et al, 2019;Xia & Rosakis, 2021), the preferential pulverization of crystalline over granular rocks in these damage zones (e.g., Aben et al, 2017;Dor et al, 2006;Mitchell et al, 2011), and surface roughness related to crack growth (e.g., Okamoto et al, 2019;Renard et al, 2012;Schmittbuhl et al, 1993). These brittle damage processes also have implications for engineering applications involving fracture propagation such as hydraulic fracturing (e.g., Antinao Fuentealba et al, 2020), stability of underground openings (e.g., Zhao et al, 2010), damage and seismic radiation from underground explosions (e.g., Sammis, 2011) and allow us to evaluate assumptions regarding the evolution of fracture properties used in micromechanical models of failure in polycrystalline materials (Ashby & Sammis, 1990;Bhat et al, 2012).…”
Section: 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 𝑑𝑑mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rocks display different failure mechanisms due to variations in cohesive strength and ability to alleviate stress concentration through yielding and grain crushing (e.g., Rück et al, 2017;Vora & Morgan, 2019). Understanding how mixed mode dynamic fracture propagation manifests in these rock types is critically important in understanding the development of seismogenic fault damage zones, which exert fundamental controls on coseismic energy dissipation, interseismic strain energy accumulation, and the longer-term hydraulic structure of fault zones (e.g., Aben et al, 2017;Faulkner et al, 2011;Okubo et al, 2019;Xia & Rosakis, 2021), the preferential pulverization of crystalline over granular rocks in these damage zones (e.g., Aben et al, 2017;Dor et al, 2006;Mitchell et al, 2011), and surface roughness related to crack growth (e.g., Okamoto et al, 2019;Renard et al, 2012;Schmittbuhl et al, 1993). These brittle damage processes also have implications for engineering applications involving fracture propagation such as hydraulic fracturing (e.g., Antinao Fuentealba et al, 2020), stability of underground openings (e.g., Zhao et al, 2010), damage and seismic radiation from underground explosions (e.g., Sammis, 2011) and allow us to evaluate assumptions regarding the evolution of fracture properties used in micromechanical models of failure in polycrystalline materials (Ashby & Sammis, 1990;Bhat et al, 2012).…”
Section: 𝐴𝐴 𝐴𝐴 𝑑𝑑mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on natural faults have documented self-affine behavior with two distinct scaling transformations along the direction of slip and perpendicularly to it (Mandelbrot, 1985;Power and Tullis, 1991;Schmittbuhl et al, 1993;Candela et al, 2009). This self-affinity has been more recently quantified over several length scales, with an overall H perp /H slip ratio of ∼1.33 (e.g., Candela et al, 2012;Renard et al, 2013), which terminates at the micrometer-scale where a transition to an isotropic scaling roughness occurs (Siman-Tov et al, 2013; Candela and Brodsky, 2016;Okamoto et al, 2019). The fault studied in this work is, however, quite isotropic in origin as shown by the clustering around 1 of both H perp /H slip and a perp /a slip for Zone 2, which is the least weathered and most recently uncovered zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lab-based studies, high-accuracy laser profilom-eters, white light interferometers, and atomic force microscopes have facilitated the investigation of fault asperities from centimeter down to nanometer scales (e.g., Candela et al, 2009;Siman-Tov et al, 2013;Renard et al, 2013;. More recently, structure from motion-multiview stereo (SfM-MVS) photogrammetry has been applied to the characterization of fault roughness (e.g., Corradetti et al, 2017;Olkowicz et al, 2019;Zambrano et al, 2019;Okamoto et al, 2019), which carries the advantage of being highly scalable while only requiring a consumer-grade camera for data acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that the thickness X over which deformation is accommodated is equal to the diameter of the largest plastically deforming asperities (i.e., the deformation is accommodated in a hemisphere, which is the asperity), we can relate the sliding strain rate to the largest asperity size L (which is thought to correspond to the variable Dc), although we do not explicitly make this assumption a priori. However, it is an appealing possibility because Dc has been suggested to be a length scale that demarcates the transition from plastic deformation to brittle mechanisms (Candela & Brodsky, 2016), and variations in Dc can be predicted from material properties (Okamoto et al, 2019). Furthermore, as we will demonstrate below, a length scale related to the size of the deforming region emerges naturally from 'strain-gradient plasticity' theory (e.g., Nix & Gao, 1998).…”
Section: Bowden and Tabor Friction With Strain Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 97%