2015
DOI: 10.3386/w21830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Minimum Wage and the Great Recession: Evidence from the Current Population Survey

Abstract: Significant portions of text draw heavily on the text of Clemens and Wither (2014), which this paper supplements. This applies, in particular, to sections describing the minimum wage literature, the background associated with the minimum wage changes analyzed, the backdrop of this period's aggregate employment shifts, and the basic estimation framework. Special thanks to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Zipperer () contests this conclusion, additional evidence presented in Clemens () and Clemens and Wither () supports the original finding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…While Zipperer () contests this conclusion, additional evidence presented in Clemens () and Clemens and Wither () supports the original finding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For our main analyses, we use the real ($2012) minimum wage, which is the nominal wage deflated by the consumer price index, but we report results for several other measures in the Appendix and note that estimates are not sensitive to how we measure the minimum wage. Specifically, in some analyses we use the nominal minimum wage and we also follow Card () and Clemens () and normalize the minimum wage by the median wage rate in the state, and refer to this as the “relative minimum wage.” The motivation underlying this relative measure is to capture the “bite” of the minimum wage; if the median hourly wage in the state is substantially higher than the minimum wage, then the minimum wage is less binding, and increases in the minimum wage may elicit smaller responses on labor outcomes (Lee, ). Therefore, we take the ratio of the nominal minimum wage in the state to the prevailing state‐specific median “hourly” wage.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to fewer than 3 percent of college graduates over the age of 50 (Table 1). A similar identification strategy is used by Clemens (2015) to study the employment effects of federal minimum wage increases during the Great Recession. 50 Let g denote an age-education group (high school dropouts age 20-29, high school graduates age 20-29,..., college graduates age 50+), and Bite g denote the fraction of workers (across all states and years) in group g that earn within $0.25 of the prevailing minimum wage.…”
Section: Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%