2017
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1289156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mismeasure of academic labour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such transparency, they suggest, “could assist, not just those women who choose to progress to higher levels in academia, but also academics generally to achieve equity in the balance of their work roles and other activities” (Barrett & Barrett, 2011, p. 153). However, it is well documented that transparent allocation of work remains a challenge even in its technical or managerial operation (see, e.g., Hornibrook, 2012; Papadopoulos, 2017). Kenny and Fluck (2014) provide an argument that involvement of academic staff in the development and implementation of the workload allocation process helps achieve both transparency and equity, but this is somewhat speculative.…”
Section: Academic Workload Allocation: Constructing Inequity As Impossiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such transparency, they suggest, “could assist, not just those women who choose to progress to higher levels in academia, but also academics generally to achieve equity in the balance of their work roles and other activities” (Barrett & Barrett, 2011, p. 153). However, it is well documented that transparent allocation of work remains a challenge even in its technical or managerial operation (see, e.g., Hornibrook, 2012; Papadopoulos, 2017). Kenny and Fluck (2014) provide an argument that involvement of academic staff in the development and implementation of the workload allocation process helps achieve both transparency and equity, but this is somewhat speculative.…”
Section: Academic Workload Allocation: Constructing Inequity As Impossiblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, time spent on academic activity is inherently contradictory, and this may contribute to individuals' struggles to establish a coherent academic identity (Billot and King 2015). This contradiction is exacerbated by the failure of academic workload models to represent the scope of academic labour, resulting in serious under-estimates of the actual work-effort involved in undertaking any allocated academic role (Papadopoulos 2017), as identified by our interviewees. Here, we recognise a secondary contradiction: between institutional needs for resources to be used efficiently today (restricting the time-allowances given to dual-role academics), and institutional desires for doctorally qualified staff in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Standardized approaches may result in a failure to maximize faculty talent and achieve their expressly intended purpose: to distribute workload realistically and evenly. 33 Although Bittner and Bechtel's 34 study of nursing faculty workload in Massachusetts recommended development of a consistent workload allocation formula, they also argued for more flexible models. Specifically, the authors suggested development of collaborative joint appointments, creative educator positions, and examining "the workload of older nurse faculty members in a creative way to allow for more flexibility and better work-life balance, therefore retaining these knowledgeable faculty."…”
Section: Offer a Variety Of Communication Options Identifyingmentioning
confidence: 99%