2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The missing intrauterine device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8,9,13] Ultrasonography is readily available, non-invasive with less effort, however, sonogram is not reliable if the device is surrounded by the omentum and bowel loops. [1,21] It is effective when used early particularly in high risk patients and when the insertion is associated with severe pain probably indicating perforation. [22] In other studies, plain abdominal x-ray with a marker in the uterus was the main modality of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8,9,13] Ultrasonography is readily available, non-invasive with less effort, however, sonogram is not reliable if the device is surrounded by the omentum and bowel loops. [1,21] It is effective when used early particularly in high risk patients and when the insertion is associated with severe pain probably indicating perforation. [22] In other studies, plain abdominal x-ray with a marker in the uterus was the main modality of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of IUCDs is disproportionally higher in developing countries (14.5%) compared to developed countries (7.9%). [1,2] Clients at a Rural Tertiary Hospital in South Western Nigeria Altogether, 13.6% of couples around the world have selected IUCDs for birth control. [2] In Nigeria, the level of acceptance ranges from 39.7%-64% [3] with a failure rate of 1-2% each year has been reported worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%