The missing link in the evolution of product design: a strategy roadmap towards product development success

Abstract

Purpose The literature on product design/development (PD) has attempted to understand the consumer but has not provided a comprehensive framework for product marketers and designers. Thus, this paper aims to compile and link the main topics in the literature on PD to create a foundation for strategic development in this field. Design/methodology/approach This research adopted a “fit-for-purpose” methodology, a cross-referencing method and a meta-narrative approach that are appropriate for reviewing studies in a field involving complex topics and areas in which the literature is still developing. Findings To enhance the quality of product development, there is a need for PD strategy based on a clear understanding of many factors: the consumer; the complex interrelations among a product’s values, dimensions and personalities; PD theories; and other related variables. Practical implications This study found that PD studies should concentrate more on codifying strategies to enhance product development success. This is particularly important in view of consumers’ varied and changeable tastes in the global market and the differing insights of product marketers and designers. Originality/value This comprehensive systematic review is a unique study that contributes to future business-to-consumer and business-to-business research by compiling scattered and hidden strategies, theories and variables in the PD/development literature.

Developing a roadmap for implementing digital transformation to improve the resilience of port operations

“…The fit-for-purpose methodology is a versatile research design approach that highlights the importance of customizing research methods to meet the particular requirements of the search query. This methodology is based on the notion that there is no universal research approach that can be applied to all research scenarios, and that the most effective research methods will differ depending on the context of the research (Sameti, 2022). The fit-for-purpose methodology is an advantageous strategy for conducting research, as it allows researchers to customize their research methods according to the specific requirements of their research investigation.…”

“…The research question that is intended to be answered is: what are the relevant steps for establishing a digital transformation implementation process that enables and increases the resilience of port operations? In this sense, the methodology used in this study was adapted to the purpose in question (i.e., fit-forpurpose methodology) (Sameti, 2022), using a cross-referencing method (Yanagihara;Fujihara, 2021) and a metanarrative approach (Hunter, 2019). These methods were found to be adequate for conducting a comprehensive literature review in a field characterized by intricate subjects and continuous development.…”

Strategies for the adoption of innovation processes in agricultural productive units of the Department of La Guajira -Colombia: Literary review and systemic approach

“…Ferrer-Serrano et al ( 2022) argue that the harmony achieved between generating capabilities and unique resources and innovation leads to competitive advantages and simplified business processes. This helps to create new products and services that satisfy consumers' requirements, needs, and desires; therefore, organizations must be flexible, abandoning rigid structures that take away space for creativity (Sameti, 2022). Melander and Arvidsson (2022) argue that the correct direction of the organization, in which managers inject dynamism, fosters collectivity, cooperation between different departments, collaboration with other companies, and opens spaces for new ideas to arise and adapt to the new realities that occur in the business world, even in constantly changing environments.…”

Does change agent selection procedure matter? A strategic decision-making toward a more objective selection approach

“…To establish a table of competencies from the selected studies, the competencies presented in each study were analyzed by (1) basic open coding and (2) thematic analysis for a more in-depth understanding of concepts and their corresponding themes (see Saldaña, 2015; Sameti, 2022). The authors agreed on four categories of competencies, namely: (1) character, (2) leadership and managerial, (3) social and political and (4) strategic and technical.…”