2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.722647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Mistaken Assumption of Intentionality in Equal Protection Law: Psychological Science and the Interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, police could simply form the perception of "suspicion" more often based on a broader interpretation of the social cues that capture police attention and evoke official reactions (Alpert et al 2005). The latter explanation conforms more closely to a social-psychological process of racial stereotyping, where the attribution of suspicion is more readily attached to specific behaviors and contexts for minorities than it might be for whites (Thompson 1999;Richardson and Pittinsky 2005). We did find evidence of stops that are best explained as "racial incongruity" stops: high rates of minority stops in predominantly white precincts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, police could simply form the perception of "suspicion" more often based on a broader interpretation of the social cues that capture police attention and evoke official reactions (Alpert et al 2005). The latter explanation conforms more closely to a social-psychological process of racial stereotyping, where the attribution of suspicion is more readily attached to specific behaviors and contexts for minorities than it might be for whites (Thompson 1999;Richardson and Pittinsky 2005). We did find evidence of stops that are best explained as "racial incongruity" stops: high rates of minority stops in predominantly white precincts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%