2019
DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1694701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mitochondrial DNA control region sequences from the Chinese Miao population of southeastern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guizhou, a province inhabited by 56 ethnic groups officially recognized by Chinese government, has been a hot province in forensic genetics, anthropologists and ethnographers (Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Luo, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Zhang, et al, 2018; Guo et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; Le et al, 2019; Luo et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019). The population structures of Guizhou populations in different ethnic has been reported, particularly in Gelao (Chen, Han, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Luo, et al, 2018), Han (Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018), Miao (Chen et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; Le et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019), and Bouyei (Luo et al, 2019; L. Zhang, 2015), but Tujia is unclear. In present study, we used various analytical methods (Fst, Nei's genetic distance, N‐J tree, MDS, and PCA) constructed population structure of Guizhou Tujia with diverse ethnic groups from seven major language families (Sinitic: Han, Hui; Tai‐Kadai: Gelao, Zhuang, Sui, Mulao; Tibeto‐Burman: Tibetan, Yi; Hmong‐Mien: Miao; Turkic: Uyghur, Kyrgyz, Kazakh; Mogolian: Mogolian; Tungusic: Xibe) in China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guizhou, a province inhabited by 56 ethnic groups officially recognized by Chinese government, has been a hot province in forensic genetics, anthropologists and ethnographers (Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Luo, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Zhang, et al, 2018; Guo et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; Le et al, 2019; Luo et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019). The population structures of Guizhou populations in different ethnic has been reported, particularly in Gelao (Chen, Han, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Luo, et al, 2018), Han (Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018), Miao (Chen et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; Le et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019), and Bouyei (Luo et al, 2019; L. Zhang, 2015), but Tujia is unclear. In present study, we used various analytical methods (Fst, Nei's genetic distance, N‐J tree, MDS, and PCA) constructed population structure of Guizhou Tujia with diverse ethnic groups from seven major language families (Sinitic: Han, Hui; Tai‐Kadai: Gelao, Zhuang, Sui, Mulao; Tibeto‐Burman: Tibetan, Yi; Hmong‐Mien: Miao; Turkic: Uyghur, Kyrgyz, Kazakh; Mogolian: Mogolian; Tungusic: Xibe) in China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guizhou, a province inhabited by 56 ethnic groups officially recognized by Chinese government, has been a hot province in forensic genetics, anthropologists and ethnographers (Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Luo, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Zhang, et al, 2018; Guo et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; Le et al, 2019; Luo et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019). The population structures of Guizhou populations in different ethnic has been reported, particularly in Gelao (Chen, Han, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018; Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Luo, et al, 2018), Han (Chen, He, Zou, Wang, Jia, et al, 2018), Miao (Chen et al, 2019; Han et al, 2019; Le et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019), and Bouyei (Luo et al, 2019; L. Zhang, 2015), but Tujia is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of F haplogroup, F1a1a and F3a1, are displayed in all three ethnicities. Previously reported in the Chinese Miao (Hmong) (Le et al, 2019) and French Guianese Hmong (Brucato et al, 2012), F3a1 also occurs at a high frequency in our Pathen (13.89%) (Brucato et al, 2012;Le et al, 2019). On the other hand, F1a1a, first discovered in HM East Asians (Wen et al, 2005) and later described in Hmong French Guianese (Brucato et al, 2012), is most prevalent in Dao (16.28%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The diversity of haplotype and random matching probability were estimated according to Stoneking et al [ 9 ]. In addition, our data are compared with other data available from the literature, including Guizhou Miao [ 10 ], Henan Han [ 11 ], Chinese Bai [ 12 ], Xinjiang Mongolian [ 13 ], Southwest Gelao [ 14 ], Yunnan Dai [ 15 ], Liaoning Han [ 15 ], Pinghua Han in Guangxi [ 16 ], Xinjiang Kazakh [ 17 ], Beijing Han [ 15 ], Mulao in Guangxi [ 18 ], Chinese Hui [ 19 ], Kashmiri [ 20 ], Hazara people of Pakistan [ 21 ], African Americans in Orange, California [ 22 ], African Americans in Vermont, California [ 22 ], Parana of Brazil [ 23 ], Iranian [ 24 ], Alto Parana [ 25 ], Iraqi [ 26 ], Arabian [ 26 ], Kuwaiti [ 26 ], Palestinian [ 26 ], Anatolians in Turkey [ 26 ], Kurds in Iran [ 27 ], Bosnian of Roma [ 28 ], Gulagic in Africa [ 29 ], Punjab in Pakistan [ 30 ], Sierra Leone Mendes in West Africa [ 29 ], Tengnai in Sierra Leone [ 29 ], Mandinka in Sierra Leone [ 29 ], Polish Gypsies [ 31 ], Finns [ 32 ], Turks [ 33 ], Northern Tunis [ 34 ], North-central Moroccan [ 34 ], Mozabit [ 34 ], Moroccan Berber [ 34 ], Gdansk in northern Poland [ 35 ], Upper Silesia in southern Poland [ 35 ], Novgorod in northwest Russia [ 35 ], Christmas Island in Australia [ 36 ], Romanians [ 37 ], Pukhtunhwa in Pakistan [ 38 ], Mosuo [ 39 ], Bengali [ 40 ], Khattak of the Peshawar Valley [ 41 ], Kheshgi of the Peshawar Valley [ 41 ], Slovak [ 42 ], Hokkaido in Japan [ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%