The Mobile Phone and the Public Sphere

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the influence of the mobile phone on the public sphere, in particular with regard to its effect on news agendas, gatekeepers and primary definers. Using the examples of the Chinese SARS outbreak (2003), the south-east Asian tsunami (December 2004) and the London bombings (July 2005), the author questions the extent to which the mobile phone is challenging conventional and official sources of information. At times of national and personal calamity, the mobile phone is used to document and report events from eyewitnesses and those closely involved. Using multimedia messages (MMS) or text messages (SMS) to communities of friends and families, as well as audio phone calls, mobile phone users may precede and scoop official sources and thwart censorship and news blackouts. They can also provide valuable evidence of what actually occurred. Users are able to take pictures and short films and transmit these rapidly to others along with reports of what is happening where they are; they are also able to access other media broadcasts and the internet. They are what have become known as `citizen journalists'. The evidence suggests that mobile phone usage is contributing to the public sphere and in some instances is circumventing official repression or inadequate information. There is also an indication that the `mobcam' is capturing images that would otherwise be lost. However, the mainstream media has been quick to take advantage of this citizen journalism and mediate it within its own parameters.

Conceptions of Emergency Calls: Emergency Communication in an Age of Mobile Communication and Prevalence of Anxiety

“…Society's emergency communication needs to adapt to the development of communications technology and to the resulting changes in citizens' communication and organizational patterns. As technology‐driven research in areas such as informatics suggests, the trend is for new complementary forms of emergency communication by SMS, MMS, and other digital communication means (see, e.g., Jaeger et al, 2007; Gordon, 2007; Laituri & Kodrich, 2008; Samarajiva, 2005). There is huge potential in various communications technology solutions to improve communication between society and citizens who feel they have fallen into distress.…”

A Work‐In‐Process Literature Review: Incorporating Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication

“…In the last decade, cell phones have acted as instrumental communication modes during crises. During and following the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Tsunami, the 2002 SARS outbreak, and the 2005 London Bombings, victims and others used their phones to communicate when televisions, newspapers, or radios were either unavailable or had not yet broken news of these obviously unexpected events (Gordon, 2007). Likewise, in the midst of a media blackout, short message services (SMS) from mobile phones became the primary news source following the postelection violence in Kenya (Makinen & Kuira, 2008).…”

The media as ‘home-making’ tools: life story of a Filipino migrant in Milan

“…And so, when mobile came, it made a lot of difference in telecommunication in Nigeria. Lots of difference, within last 5 years … (Asano, 2005) Mobile phones have not only become fundamental tools for influencing the public sphere, as Janey Gordon (2007) and Vicente Rafael (2003) brilliantly demonstrated, but are also playing a central role in nurturing both the strictly private realm of migrants and their parochial one (Lofland, 1998), becoming the most important means of 'keeping up ties with loved ones', that is, of taking care of remote relations.…”