2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(02)00983-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mode transition of the bacterial colony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only available data we could compare our results with were those on B. circulans, on soft agar. From [7], we estimated that the diffusion constant varies as the agar concentration to the power −5, which is compatible with our findings. It would be interesting to have some similar experimental results for B. subtilis and P. mirabilis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only available data we could compare our results with were those on B. circulans, on soft agar. From [7], we estimated that the diffusion constant varies as the agar concentration to the power −5, which is compatible with our findings. It would be interesting to have some similar experimental results for B. subtilis and P. mirabilis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Let us consider the diffusion constant values: if the theoretical diffusion coefficient of a particle of diameter 1 µm in water is of the order of 10 −4 mm 2 h −1 , the diffusion coefficient of bacteria like Bacillus circulans [7] or E. Coli [4] in water is between 0.1 and 1 mm 2 h −1 . In agar, Eiha estimated a diffusion coefficient for B. circulans between 1 and 10 −4 mm 2 h −1 for agar concentrations between 0.3% and 0.9% [7]. We did not find analogous measurements for B. subtilis or for P. mirabilis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting possibility is that in high C agar cell densities could reach large enough values to elicit quorum sensing responses (36). Experimentally, the situation for C ≥ 0.4% is also complicated by the observation of coexisting subpopulations (see results and also (34)), one growing on the surface and one in the bulk, which does not penetrate very deeply (the dynamics is no longer 2D as assumed). Modelling these very different conditions is left to a future study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RDM employs a diffusion‐like term for microbial migration and a reaction term for nutrient consumption (and growth) based on the Monod equation where u is rate of growth, n is nutrient concentration, k and K S are the reaction constants. The general form of the RDM model, which couples microbial growth and movement with nutrient diffusion and consumption is given as [ Golding et al , 1998; Mimura et al , 2000; Eiha et al , 2002] where b indicates microbial concentration, D b and D n are local diffusion coefficients of microbial and nutrient fields (representing random motility and diffusion), t is time, μ is the rate of microbial decay and α is a yield term linking consumption to growth. Several modifications are made to accommodate various biological processes, such as microbial death, population‐based diffusion coefficient, and cutoff of reaction when microbial density indicates a population less than 1 cell.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%