The Proceedings of 2011 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icrms.2011.5979378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modeling method on failure prognostics uncertainties in maintenance policy decision process

Abstract: The maintenance support process of the equipment with failure prognostics is analyzed carefully in this paper. And the uncertainty factors which exist in this process are presented. Then they are separated into two groups: from the randomness and from the incomplete comprehend. The definitions of each group are given and researched in detail at the same time. And the quantitative analysis method of the primary uncertainty factors is given. The model of maintenance policy decision making is presented simultaneo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenge of managing uncertainties associated with prognostics has been recently addressed in [1][2][4][5]. Uncertainty management in prognostics entails to identify, classify and analyze uncertainty sources with the aim of associating to the RUL predictions provided by a prognostic model an estimate of its uncertainty [4][5][6][7], i.e., a measure of the expected degree of mismatch between the real and predicted equipment failure time. This information, provided in the form of a probability distribution of the equipment RUL, can be used by the decision maker to confidently plan maintenance actions, according to the desired risk tolerance [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of managing uncertainties associated with prognostics has been recently addressed in [1][2][4][5]. Uncertainty management in prognostics entails to identify, classify and analyze uncertainty sources with the aim of associating to the RUL predictions provided by a prognostic model an estimate of its uncertainty [4][5][6][7], i.e., a measure of the expected degree of mismatch between the real and predicted equipment failure time. This information, provided in the form of a probability distribution of the equipment RUL, can be used by the decision maker to confidently plan maintenance actions, according to the desired risk tolerance [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a degrading equipment is affected by several sources of uncertainty such as the randomness in the future degradation of the equipment, the inaccuracy of the prognostic model used to perform the prediction and the noise in the sensor data used by the prognostic model to obtain the RUL prediction. Thus, any RUL prediction provided by a prognostic model should be accompanied by an estimate of its uncertainty (Tang et al 2009;Liu et al 2011) in order to confidently plan maintenance actions, taking into account the degree of mismatch between the RUL predicted by the prognostic model and the real RUL of the equipment (Coble 2010;Zio 2012). In this respect, a method able to estimate a probability density function of the degrading equipment RUL is PF, which is a model-based approach successfully used in prognostics applications (e.g., Vachtsevanos et al 2006, Orchard et al 2005, Orchard & Vachtsevanos 2009, Cadini et al 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In presence of uncertainties, e.g., due to the scatter in the microstructural and manufacturing characteristics, the loading and external conditions variability, etc., the damage state, at any time instant, is better represented by a random variable ) (  rather than by a deterministic quantity [25]. As a consequence, also the equipment RUL at the present time J  should be represented by a random variable ) ( J RUL  [23].…”
Section: B Prognostic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty is caused by model uncertainty (e.g., due to the limited amount of data used to build it), uncertainty on the observations (e.g., due to sensor noise), and process uncertainty (e.g., due to uncertain future loads and operating conditions) [13]. The intrinsic ability of RVM and GPR to fit probability distribution functions (pdfs) to the degradation data is desirable for prognostics where uncertainty management is of paramount importance [23][24]. In practice, the RVM method is actually a special case of a Gaussian Process (GP) [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%