The Moderating Effect of Extraversion–Introversion Differences on Group Idea Generation Performance

Abstract

Previous research provides evidence that individual differences in the personality characteristic of extraversion/introversion can play a significant role in group idea generation. Cognitive stimulation has also been shown to have a significant, though inconsistent, influence on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. We conducted two controlled experiments using a web-based group simulator to empirically test the impacts of these factors on group idea generation. In the first experiment, extraverts outperformed introverts in computer-mediated groups. In the second experiment, we exposed participants in computer-mediated groups to four levels of idea stimulation ranging from none to extremely high. Extraverts generated more unique and diverse ideas than did introverts in moderate-and high-stimuli conditions only. In sum, our study provides empirical evidence regarding the significant effect of individual differences, in this case the personality characteristic of extraversion/introversion on idea generation in a computer-mediated group. We have at UNIV OF VIRGINIA on October 4, 2012 sgr.sagepub.com Downloaded from Jung et al. 31 also demonstrated that a relationship exists between the level of cognitive stimulation and idea generation, with moderate levels of idea stimulation optimal for extraverts in computer-mediated groups. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Influence of Extraversion on Social Loafing Behavior: A Pilot Study

“…The interpretation of the results suggested that identifiability may be the critical factor for a better understanding of the link between extraversion and performance in a group task. Despite the extensive evidence indicating a positive relationship between extraversion and group performance (Bell, 2007;Jung et al, 2012;Kramer, Bhave, & Johnson, 2014), the results of the present study demonstrated that extraversion might be associated with performance only in certain circumstances. As the experimental task used in this study does not require inter-individual coordination, extraverted individuals' performance decrement in nonidentifiable condition can be attributed to the motivational loss.…”

“…Individuals with high extraversion are expected to be sociable, talkative, energetic, optimistic, and enthusiastic (Costa & McCrae, 1992), which can make them more vulnerable to be a desirable and high performer group member. Previous research has provided evidence that extraversion may be associated with better individual performance in group tasks (Balthazard, Potter, & Warren, 2004;Jung, Lee, & Karsten, 2012). Moreover, Barry and Stewart (1997) suggested that extraversion may be the most relevant variable in predicting individual differences in the member's contribution to group performance.…”

Designing Physical-Digital Workspaces to Support Globally Collaborative Work

“…Factors such as individual personalities and group cohesion (such as psychological safety (Edmonson, 1999)) can influence how individual work is completed. For example, in terms of personality, an introvert (C. G. Jung, 1946) may produce written notes, where an extrovert may narrate his activity and readjust based on the reactions of peers, using them as a sort of mirror (J. H. Jung, Lee, & Karsten, 2012).…”

Improving Open Innovation: Challenges for Managing Communication and Creative Ideation

“…There is a significant lack of theory and theoretical perspectives from which the 'user-innovation literature' draws, especially in the management literature (Bogers et al, 2010): proposed explanations such as expected benefits, information stickiness, intrinsic benefits, career concerns or user's knowledge and expertise fail to add up to a coherent theoretical explanation. Some anecdotal research results concentrate on internal, subjective motivators (Daniels et al, 2011;Jung, Lee, & Karsten, 2011;Obschonka, Silbereisen, & Schmitt-Rodermund, 2012), while others may point to external, financial factors (Toubia, 2006); some research even suggest that creative thinking can and should be taught, and reinforced through positive feedback channels, rather than just motivated (Daley, 2005).…”