2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moderating effects of mate-value on the relationship between perceived sex ratio and mating strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-concept is an individual's subjective perception and judgment of his or her physiological state, personality, attitude, social role, past experience, and other aspects (Ling et al, 2016). Based on this definition, the subjective sense of wealth provided by financial resources is strongly related to self-concept, and mate value, as a basic part of self-concept, should also be influenced by such resources (Millar et al, 2019). Researchers have found that mate value has a significant predictive effect with respect to the mate selection strategy (Surbey and Brice, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Mediating Effect Of Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-concept is an individual's subjective perception and judgment of his or her physiological state, personality, attitude, social role, past experience, and other aspects (Ling et al, 2016). Based on this definition, the subjective sense of wealth provided by financial resources is strongly related to self-concept, and mate value, as a basic part of self-concept, should also be influenced by such resources (Millar et al, 2019). Researchers have found that mate value has a significant predictive effect with respect to the mate selection strategy (Surbey and Brice, 2007;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Mediating Effect Of Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is to some degree self-evident, it is also supported by a large literature showing that being married predicts higher SWB (Haring-Hidore et al, 1985;Diener, 2000; but see Stutzer & Frey, 2006). The sex ratio has been shown to impact a wide variety of behaviours (reviewed in Maner & Ackerman, 2020), from promiscuous behaviour (Kandrik et al, 2015;Millar et al, 2019;Schacht & Borgerhoff Mulder, 2015) to facial hair fashion (Barber, 2001) to female economic empowerment (Teso, 2019;Grosjean & Khattar, 2019) to economic activity (Chang & Zhang, 2015;Griskevicius et al, 2012;Wei & Zhang, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We also tried to understand the role of social inclusion in accounting for people's responses to learning dealbreaker/maker information. We expected social inclusion to be multi-faceted and, thus, we assessed it in the context of mating (i.e., mate value; Waynforth, 2001;Kirsner et al, 2003;Millar et al, 2019), dispositional favorability towards oneself that may index how much others like them (i.e., self-esteem; Leary, 1999), and people's dispositional feeling of being left out, unsupported, not belonging (i.e., loneliness; Russell, 1996). Indeed, each trait revealed different processes of responding to dealbreakers/makers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We base our thinking loosely on the sociometer theory that suggests that measure of one's sense of social inclusion are outcomes based on feedback from the world in terms of how much others like them and want to affiliate with them (Leary et al, 1995;Leary, 1999;Kirkpatrick and Ellis, 2001). Social inclusion may come in at least three forms: mate value (i.e., a person's sense of embodying qualities that prospective partners are interested in; Waynforth, 2001;Kirsner et al, 2003;Millar et al, 2019), selfesteem (i.e., their sense of general acceptance by others; Leary, 1999), and loneliness (i.e., the emotion of feeling left out, unsupported, not belonging; Russell, 1996).…”
Section: Individual Differences In Real or Perceived Social Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%