2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moderating role of leader and follower sex in dyads on the leadership behavior–leader effectiveness relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, based on the social role theory and the similarity‐attraction paradigm, the present study extends previous research on gender roles in the organization (e.g., Douglas, ; Carli & Eagly, ; Eagly & Carli, ; Eagly, Wood, and Diekman, ; Wang et al, ) by testing the moderating effect of supervisor gender on the relationship between SR‐HRM practices and female employees’ turnover intentions. Studies interested in the role of gender in employees’ turnover intentions put a focus on individual‐level determinants, such as employee satisfaction and commitment (Russ & McNeilly, ), perceived coworker and supervisor support (Ng & Sorensen, ), role stress (Kim, Murrmann, & Lee, ), and psychological contract (Blomme, Tromp, & van Rheede, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, based on the social role theory and the similarity‐attraction paradigm, the present study extends previous research on gender roles in the organization (e.g., Douglas, ; Carli & Eagly, ; Eagly & Carli, ; Eagly, Wood, and Diekman, ; Wang et al, ) by testing the moderating effect of supervisor gender on the relationship between SR‐HRM practices and female employees’ turnover intentions. Studies interested in the role of gender in employees’ turnover intentions put a focus on individual‐level determinants, such as employee satisfaction and commitment (Russ & McNeilly, ), perceived coworker and supervisor support (Ng & Sorensen, ), role stress (Kim, Murrmann, & Lee, ), and psychological contract (Blomme, Tromp, & van Rheede, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In addition, since previous studies have shown that supervisor gender has an important impact on employee outcomes (Douglas, ; Wang, Chiang, Tsai, Lin, & Cheng, ), we argue that supervisor gender has a moderating effect on the relationship between SR‐HRM practices and female employees’ turnover intentions. Previous research indicates that when the aim is to affect women's turnover intentions, the strength of female and male supervisors’ influence might be different (e.g., Douglas, ; Eagly & Carli, ; Lämsä & Piilola, ; Wang et al, ). To understand how supervisor gender alters the strength of the relationship between SR‐HRM practices and female employees’ turnover intentions, it is necessary to compare the effects of the same practices performed by both female and male supervisors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…While neither one of them moderated the paths tested in our model, the relational demography literature (Somech, ; Wells & Aicher, ) suggests that leadership impact could well vary by leader‐follower demographic similarity (e.g. Douglas, ; Wang et al, ). Gender differences in leadership preferences (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Hence, we controlled for leaders' gender as well as for possible leader‐subordinate gender interactions, originating, for example, from male followers responding differently to TL as a function of leader gender (e.g. Douglas, ). Consistent with previous theory and research (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequences may, in turn, increase the follower's intrinsic motivation, which is an important driver for employees' extra effort (e.g., Piccolo and Colquit 2006;Shamir et al 1993). Recently, Douglas (2012) found that transformational leaders who make clear communication, set the goals, and motivate employees, inspire followers to reach beyond their own self-interests and further encourage them to do more than one is expected.…”
Section: The Effect Of Leadership Styles On Follower's Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%