2007
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.25525781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moderating Role of Top Management Team Interdependence: Implications for Real Teams and Working Groups

Abstract: Prior research evidence shows that within-team interdependence moderates the process-performance relationship in small groups. Data collected from 94 top management teams (TMTs) replicated and extended the small groups finding. Specifically, TMTs with high interdependence (i.e., real teams) had higher team and subsequent firm performance when the team was more cohesive and had more communication. However, teams with low interdependence (i.e., working groups) had higher performance when communication and cohesi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
255
2
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
255
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Task interdependence has been found to positively moderate the cohesion-performance (Barrick, Bradley, Kristof-Brown, & Colbert, 2007;Gully et al, 1995) and process-performance (LePine et al, 2008) relationships. When considering compositional emergence (e.g., shared mental models), cognition was more predictive of team behavioral process for highly interdependent than for moderately interdependent teams, which is consistent with the expectation that as the interdependence of the task increases, overlap in members' understanding of important aspects of the task and team will enable smoother synchronization of joint actions, and permit members to better anticipate one another's needs (Marks et al, 2000(Marks et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Task Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task interdependence has been found to positively moderate the cohesion-performance (Barrick, Bradley, Kristof-Brown, & Colbert, 2007;Gully et al, 1995) and process-performance (LePine et al, 2008) relationships. When considering compositional emergence (e.g., shared mental models), cognition was more predictive of team behavioral process for highly interdependent than for moderately interdependent teams, which is consistent with the expectation that as the interdependence of the task increases, overlap in members' understanding of important aspects of the task and team will enable smoother synchronization of joint actions, and permit members to better anticipate one another's needs (Marks et al, 2000(Marks et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Task Moderatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affective reactions research generally refers to team atmosphere and how members are treated (Janssen, Van de Vliert & Veenstra 1999). In turn team viability remains a popular criterion measure yet suffers from a great deal of ambiguity (Barrick et al 2007). It is usually associated with the team-level criterion, while members who wish to remain a team member, satisfaction, team climate, team commitment and group cohesion are used as indicators of viability (Mathieu et al 2008, p. 418).…”
Section: Team Effectiveness From the Imo Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En cuanto a su utilidad, el ARS ha sido aplicado a diversos campos, por ejemplo el impacto de la urbanización en el bienestar del individuo 26 , los sistemas de economía y política 27 , el apoyo social 28 y el campo organizativo [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] . Con respecto a éste último, se ha estudiado la relación de las redes en cuanto al rendimiento, la creatividad, la transferencia de innovación, etcétera.…”
Section: El Análisis De Las Redes Sociales Un Método Para La Mejora unclassified