2010
DOI: 10.1080/00918360903543113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Moderating Roles of Gender and Anti-Gay Prejudice in Explaining Stigma by Association in Male Dyads

Abstract: Using a convenience sample of 157 undergraduates, this study explored the likeability ratings of target characters from selected film clips who were described as gay or heterosexual as they associated with a gay-described foil character (i.e., a character against which the target is compared). As predicted, male respondents who strongly endorsed anti-gay prejudice viewed gay-described targets more favorably than heterosexual-described targets when each target was paired with a gay foil. Further, this pattern o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to potential myths about transgender people specifically, we explored whether allies (i.e., people who support transgender individuals) were likely to be perceived as being transgender. Individuals are potentially at risk to take on the stigma of the groups to which they are proximate, and by extension, could be at risk to experience discrimination (Hernandez et al, 2016;Jefferson & Bramlett, 2010). We elaborate more specifically on the rationale for each myth below.…”
Section: Expanding the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to potential myths about transgender people specifically, we explored whether allies (i.e., people who support transgender individuals) were likely to be perceived as being transgender. Individuals are potentially at risk to take on the stigma of the groups to which they are proximate, and by extension, could be at risk to experience discrimination (Hernandez et al, 2016;Jefferson & Bramlett, 2010). We elaborate more specifically on the rationale for each myth below.…”
Section: Expanding the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allies (i.e., those who support a group of people) are potentially at risk to take on the stigma of the groups to which they are proximate (Hernandez et al, 2016; Jefferson & Bramlett, 2010). Stigma by association (SBA) is the process by which an individual feels threatened about or takes on a group’s stigma without actually being a member of that group (Hernandez et al, 2016; Jefferson & Bramlett, 2010).…”
Section: Transgender Ally Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation